Oh

<:PikaLaugh:802560922580942849>

Why would a female simp for anyone?

Unless Snow White is an anime trap?

@JR What did you post in <#809946774194094110> that Porcupioneer deleted?

some females do simp ...how do u think dems get voters

cause she's married and pretty cringe

That's not simping, that's just trying to run a country the same way a female would run a household (Hint: That does not work.)

https://tenor.com/view/outta-line-buggin-funny-as-hell-line-you-just-crossed-it-gif-17103282

<:KEK:795742276549607456>

the example of this is in a cartoon by Disney <:troll_face:726878856585281557>

https://tenor.com/view/disney-thumper-bunny-cute-ear-tickle-gif-8272976

No, I'm serious: The female's role in the family structure is that, when the man comes home, their mentality is "Well, the production part is done, now we just need to allot it so that everyone has enough."

Now look at how democrats run their states. They don't even think about production, because they assume it already has or inevitably will be taken care of.

okay, in a traditional structure, stay at home dads are a thing

No, I mean in the evolutionary sense.

I suppose if you believe in that

That's not saying that they can't care about production, but they're not naturally inclined to.

some ppl are more inclined for different tasks either at home or work environment ...regardless of being male or female

i normally ended up working as a babysitter for my siblings ...

Ok. Let's put it this way: are there trends that differ between males and females?

babysitter, tutor, cleaning coach

I'm not some biological determinist, I am speaking in terms of over arching trends. It's not as if people can't be individuals.

You shouldn't deny rights to individuals because of their identity...that's textbook identity politics

Whoa! Step back there, bud!

Holy shit!

When did I say anything about denying people their rights?

That escalated quickly.

You seemed to be implying that...if I'm wrong then I apologize

Apology accepted. Jeezus.

And no, I wasn't implying that.

just relax, you made a claim that seemed pretty radical, and we're trying to understand your thinking

Ok, can I post a video down in <#807374086295912488> that shows you guys the types of biological differences in thought patterns that men & women display, narrated by a clinical behavioral psychologist?

we have no doubts that there are biologial differences, but the way you worded it seemed pretty extreme, at least by my standards.

How so?

It sounded like you were saying the Nuclear Family is the *only* possible successful structure

This statement sounded like you were saying that a woman shouldn't be in a leadership position because they'd run the country like a household. In the future I recommend being more precise.

which I agree with to an extent, but I think you worded it as if women are less than

hey i was tempted for the nuclear family for decades...just didn't get any bites on the idea ..they were more interested in just having fun

No, it's not that they can't be, but there is something to be said for the collective experience of history. Like, the way men want things to be run is from a purely meritocratic point of view, so when you get to how wealth should be distributed, then there is an extreme poverty line, like what you saw with kings for example. But we learned that that didn't work.

sorry man, I'm sure your lady will come along