You're reading this off of Wikipedia, aren't you?

No. Care to enlighten me on your prudeness?

Here, there's an actual expert on this stuff. Nobody believes me, but maybe you'll believe my sources.

Spit it out okay

Did. Down in video share.

Wargaming <:PikaLaugh:802560922580942849>

What do you think his job is, exactly?

To lie?

You think he just sat on his bum and fed WG a bunch of BS?

No, I just think the company he is employed by is a laughing stock

Alright, so you don't have anything saying he's wrong.

Maybe let me finish the damn video and quit jumping the gun goddammit

Vids 45 minutes long.

So what?

You give out a source, expect it to be some time to digest

No, I'm not trying to dunk here, sorry.

I didn't mean it to come out like that.

I think 23:15 is the timestamp you're looking for.

Yeah, slow the fuck down jeez

I'm also going to listen to the whole thing

Full context is needed

So, the prototype turrets were cramped

And the Fireflies were one of those "last resort" weapons

Right. Not to mention, the Sherman did everything it needed to, right up until it hit a Tiger, of which there were only 3 encounters.

Panthers tho

76 punched through those too.

Not thru the front according to range tests, 76/77 same result

Didn't seem to be a problem in Italy.

And if there were serious problems, they would have happened in the mountains of Italy, where you couldn't maneuver.

Damn I want to sort this out but I want to listen to someone's story <:SadPepe:801485397678489660>

Go for it, man.

It was good talking, hope I didn't put you off too badly.