Any new culture is worst than old culture cause markets selling it to degenerates making it less and less aesthetic to maximize profits

They also make it less smart so the idiots can get it

“Maximise profits” ie maximising benefit to society

Culture is just the aggregate of the behaviour of individuals

That is just not true, the upper classes are better at deciding what is best for people

People getting fat is an example of that

What

They don't know how to use their freedom properly

They need strong mature leaders

If someone wants to do cocaine, eat 100 McDonald hamburgers and die, who cares? It’s their choice

You then lose 100 McDonalds and cocaine

Society has lost from that transition

Actually he paid for that thus improving the cocaine and burger business so society improved😎

Resources are limited

They earned the money, it’s theirs to spend where they like, they use the economic power they had to pay for things they enjoy

They don't actually enjoy them though , they are just enslaved to their biological desires instead of a state.

._.

There are two types of people, masters and slaves

Uhhh

People don't know what is best for them , they need a class that is brought up in refined colture to know what is best, then society progresses and the idiots can be brought up in better conditions , allowing colture to become even more refined . So on and so forth

People know their preferences, and if they don’t know their preferences then they’re not their preferences

Who are you to decide what is more refined or who are idiots

You can't realize what I say cause you have been brainwashed by libs

What

It depends what definition of liberalism you’re using

The liberals that have to hide the void in their lives with consumption. They make everything equally corrupt and equally insignificant. Inheritance and class will help us combat these Comiunists in the making.

Liberalism breaks hierarchies down just like comiunism

Passing your wealth down to your descendants is just another way people can express their economic freedom, it’s not special. Hierarchical relationships are only good when people choose to be in them, or are absolutely necessary in maintaining freedom

And what about comiunism?

Communism means either the government or the majority forcing their will on individuals, to give up what they’ve earned and live as a collective where their individual desires are suppressed. You want people’s individual wills or preferences to be suppressed by the government

No comiunism is when everyone is equal but meaningless

That doesn’t mean anything

It means that when everyone is equal they lose their own value because they have no individuality or they only have unstructured individuality in late stage comiunism turning into animals, theoretically at least

Equality never actually existed in communist regimes, because they wouldn’t last one day if it did, they still had incentives but the incentives were less

You clearly don’t value individuality

If you’re going to make value judgements about what choices are good and what are bad, not on the basis of their ability to reach a desired outcome, then you don’t care about individual preferences

I do value individuality , under comiunism everyone is oppressed into a specific place , no deferent than a cog in the machine

Of course , take classical music for instance, there are a hundreds of great pieces but each one is deferent , they all are refined and excellent

According to your preferences

The market will reward the music which satisfies people’s preferences

No according to the preferences of great men