https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w19425/w19425.pdf

read this

Having private enterprise that is heavily taxed is simply an easier way to solve balance of payments when importing heavy industrial equipment. I'm not convinced that the Soviet Union wouldn't have been able to keep up the same pace in developing heavy industry if the NEP had continued. Assuming GDP numbers mean anything in a socialist state this seems like a single trendline. Is it that much of a stretch that the growth rate during the NEP years could continue? No.

having private enterprises is simply inefficient

This is certainly no "miracle"

Now imma pull up the study that I agree with lololol

economics of scale prove it

show any that does prove your thesis

or give argument up from your memory idc

here's a paper btw that shows stalin's economic policies were not the end all of argument

https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w19425/w19425.pdf

oh its that one

lmao

while I was looking for it ok

Economies of scale are diminishing and not the only source of productivity

"diminishing"

do you read yourself

cant find the one with the nails

the world gets more and more monopolised with time, you can see that by growth of income inequality and corps share in economy, as well as stock exchange importance

where do you get your opinions from

I mean it's about price setting

and lack of information

you failed with historical points few times

soviets really dropped the ball on that one

that's a n e g d o t e

do you know how much stupid investments are made each year in capitalist economy

i can find more examples than those in USSR for sure and that wouldn't prove any point, since anegdotes aren't arguments

hope you understand that

we have a putin advisor that says in soviet economical education studying prices was prohibited

which is really fucked up

Putin falsifies history many times

to force his agenda

@ni co Companies can produce enough to tap into economies of scale. The returns you get from switching from corporations or monopoly to a state are very slight and overshadowed by other sources N

also, why should Putin be any argument in economical discussion?

putin may say so but a former advisor has no reason to lie about what he did in college education

he's comparable to tsar, and tsar was shit

that's another theoretical point witouth backup

can you show any developed nation going backwards?

You're saying scale increases productivity which is just as theoretical

like, point a country which gets more decentralised, having less corps and more SME

This is basic