and that doesn't even account for the infighting that happens

that's why private industry is inefficient

Every economy is planned it's just a matter of which sectors the state should control

because anarchy of production is main reason for bureaucracy

I'd recommend reading Anatoly Karlin on this topic

it's both logical and statistically proven

In my eyes dirigism in a mixed economy is an obviously superior tried and true method towards development compared to anything you see today

bureaucracy exists to manage something and it's more likely to expand with a centralised state object than a decentralised private one

I dont care if you want 0% of private sector or 50%

I am socialist myself

Planned economies won't happen again and probably shouldn't

as long as you're not libtard we can agree

China is a planned economy

half of the french economy has the french state involved in some form or antoher

that's also why growth won't be the same as in planned economy times

can you stop comparing literal shit

I talk about active state ownership

you're shit

not involvment

you're shit

monarchist kiddy

voice reveal

We can expand the definition a bit and say all economies are planned like Tolstoy said

China is not a planned economy and that's why it's important now

if the state controls enough seats in a private company they control it effectively

bs

they just have enough ownership to have veto

Forcing whatever private industry etc. exists to bend the knee is a given

nevermind back in the evening

Having a mixed economy oughtn't mean laissez faire for the private part

Mixed economy is a pretty voided term

the best mixed system is the one that has the state enforce competition

Not necessarily

and probably run public utilities

Which economy isn't mixed

north korea's

There are none like that

Nah NK sends their workforce to other countries lol

supposedly they produce and sell heroin

Hustle

They also make cheap socialist realist statues