The queen of England (Angeland) and all monarch were (was) and are coronated on the ewish stone of scone from scotland

It is the true throne and linage of kingly house of David.

The stone of scone is historically said to be the Iacob stone from this passage: Genesis 28:18 And Iacob rose vp earely in the morning, and tooke "the stone" that hee had put for his pillowes, and set it vp for a pillar, and powred oile vpon the top of it.

Im not a big Molyneux fan, but this interview is really good:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rpsLGbxGDU

https://cullinanelaw.com/nonprofit-law-basics-how-do-i-start-a-church/

Interesting little article

>It's quite clearly a divorce from Jewry when you get down to the Scriptures
I think this is an absolutely critical point and one that people who kvetch about "christcucks" and spew "kike on a stick" miss completely. The Gospels thoroughly detail how Christians are the new covenant people and uses the metaphor of a rotten branch being trimmed from a tree and a new one being grafted on to represent Jews and gentiles respectively.
Christ states at several points that he was sent to save the Jews specifically, as they had descended into sin and rejection of God much as they did when Moses was up Mt. Sinai. Their rejection of the Messiah is essentially the final straw in ending the old Covenant, trimming the Hebrew branch. The New Covenant grafts on the Gentile branch to the tree of Faith.

Indeed, it may be another of many reasons that Jews despise whites, that they were for centuries the primary bearers of the Christian Gospels. Essentially, they are enraged and jealous that they have been replaced as the chosen.

I agree

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/10/10/magazine/the-prophet-of-germanys-new-right.html?referer=http://m.facebook.com

Interesting article

"Teutonic Idealism" with an agrarian slant

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-is-on-track-to-win-reelection/2017/10/06/91cd2af0-aa15-11e7-850e-2bdd1236be5d_story.html?utm_term=.f0d1c5f3133a#comments

from washington post of all places

I hope he runs, he is getting old. Incumbents are almost statistically guarenteed to win.

@guderian Trump is anything but conventional though

church of positive christianity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs

Are Fascistic States better or worse than Democratic states?
And by what metric do you define whether or not one or the other is 'superior?'

tbh, the tl;dr of my view is: it depends

National Socialism

For me, anyway

natsoc

lol good answer

all the way

I suppose it depends on the society

>The next century

He was talking about us, goys

Men like Rockwell and Mosely could have been leaders of America and England, instead they were slandered and labeled "Nazis" by lying media

yes

Nazis are unAmeric----

While the commies spat on our soldiers

of course Rockwell was a Nazi, but not the sort of Hollywood type you find in propaganda films

natsoc, end the degeneracy of today's america

Speaks volumes

The normie view of totalitarianism is that they are formed when an evil person comes and somehow magically takes over an entire country and starts telling people what to do, and they are always evil. In the real world totalitarian leaders are also chosen, just by fewer people and by more opaque means. The also have to worry about the approval of their people, and while removing them is harder, their fate can be much more brutal.

if we don't approve of our senators or president, it would be impossible to hunt them all down like dogs