@Orchid are you saying a dictatorship is good?

no?

when did I say that?

wasn't sure if implying

@Schwaben it would be so much stronger if it stopped providing for other nations and care for it's fucking people first

Do you think people were happier under Hitler, or under democracy?

depends on the time

pssst hitler had a very high approval rating

I don't think they were very happy as russians fucked them

russia literally raped both germany and its people

You mean Russians raped them lol

lol

Russia fucked Germany literally and figuratively yes

The Germans would have easily defeated the Soviet Union if they had chosen to fight a defensive war

I feel sympathy for the people that lived in Germany at the start of world war 2 and lived under nazism only to be taken over by communism for the remainder of their life

then again, the only reason why Germany went to war with the Soviet Union was because Stalin was massing his troops on the border in preparation for an invasion of Europe

>as if nazism was bad for non-jews

hehe

I would say that a disctatoryship is not the worst thing in the world, most human societies in the past have been autocratic in some way and many of them still managed to achieve great things. Democracy in Early america was pretty great, but now it's being used to destroy the white identity.

yes

as fun and edgy as it is to pretend Nazism is fun, it would suck to lose my own independence

being able to vote =/= independence

the Germanic Pagans flourished under tribalism and autocracy

^

that's suffrage

spending on government. for survival and trusting government to tell you how to live your life sucks

@Orchid you're right independence is from having the ability to do what you want with your own life

so you don't like taxes?

>muh roads, schools, and public projects in general

I don't

local taxes are fine

social security is dumb

boomers are the biggest welfare queens

if you can trust the state then it's fine

modern democracy gives us anything but independance, and an autocratic government doesnt necessarily have to micromanage your life. Is there really a difference between being ruled by the masses or by one person?

you can't trust people as a whole though

obviously you don't

but that's why we have tribalism

It's true, both are just two different systems that implement the same level of control

That's why homogenous societies flourish, because you can trust people who look and act like you

why do you want to be ruled over by someone so badly? Why not rule things yourself?