lay down your goal

i can do mine as aff(irmative)

well i'm typing, we can keep times brief

brief sentences

thatshould be plenty

keyboard willing

Gun control, the control (by the govt) of all private firearms, is a necessary goal in order to see murder rates by firearms cut down. I am arguing for lives, and not statistics.

lurker

AFK, but I'm for guns

I see the aggressive seizure and forfeiture of all firearms, particularly those of criminals, in order to better secure the security of our public and our peoples.

im for rec nukes

>secure the security

pardon i'm inebriated

noguns

yeah i'm done

remember to stay constructive for your argument

back to lurkin

second constructive

i can just rebut now

nah

i might surprise you two

I'll do a rebuttal

Can I do four for typing?

four mins

I can actually help you ghost. you need to rebrand into Pro Capitalism. Anti movement are jewish psyops destined to lose.

memetically

anti loses

captialism is a jewish idea and so is communism.

adam smith

what im saying is i run many propaganda outlets

anti ones always fail

The argument in order to allow citizens who, in a turbulent time, and under myriad stresses, have shown to have colossally, commonly awful coping mechanism, including physical assault. That the ordinary man, even one well trained with firearms, could not suffer an episode from one of a staggering list of mental or stress-induced illness, is just one of any number of instances where concealed carry will not help.

they built off of rage and rage rides a parabola

The seizure of firearms that I outlined before was, as well, an aggressive one, particularly of criminal property. They would be the first focus, followed by law-abiding citizens.

that's about it

The argument was inferring a man killing his family.

I wasn't clear enough, sorry

there's other formats

it's one rebuttal per constructive

nah, it's good