Something exists only in our brain and I have no problem with that, but our brain is material too

You dodged my question regarding time it seems.

.quote @matildens I love to snif and eat fard n shid

Wtf gross

@Wildfire get her daddy

What is time? What is it made of? Surely it represents something, otherwise presumably time doesn’t exist. Yea? @The AUNI

Wrong ping whoops

Time exists only in our brain, it is construct created by our brain in evolutionary struggle

@matildens

Thats one for my cringe compilation

Ah, I see that route you’re going for here. And you can’t objectively state that time is an illusion. Perhaps what we call time is. Universal physics themselves however “just are” I simply used time.

That fact that things can “just be” disproves materialism as the only worldview.

Why does matter exist? Why does gravity pull things together. They. Just. Do.

Physic laws that we know are also the products of our brain, and we can't know the real laws of the universe

Oh, but yet you’re positive the real laws of the universe are purely material?

I see.

Wtf time is literally calculated on the sun and shit

Wtf are you retards on about

You’re positive only material exists but yet unsure of the laws of the universe.

@Teeny Bops time is simply movement

I'm sure those laws are material

You’re “sure” they are.

That sounds like a falling argument. How are you sure when by your own admission you don’t know? @matildens

Imagine debating on the internet

<:reallynigga:523180516845944875> <:reallynigga:523180516845944875>

I have no reason to think they are not, that's why I'm sure they are material

That’s a horrible argument. Presumably. The reason one would assume they’re immaterial is the universal lack of a material explanation. But yet, you’re presuming that they’re SURELY material while meanwhile having absolutely no evidence to suggest that.

These things appear immaterial, yea? There’s nothing that makes it otherwise. But you’re SURE that you’re right.

That fallacy 100 tho

There’s absolutely nothing that supports your argument here but you’re sure you’re right.

@matildens you're a Caucasian shit skin whore

Why should I believe laws of the universe are not material? Humanity have newer saw anything immaterial in our entire history. The thought that something can be "immaterial" is a byproduct of our brain activity

Oof too complicated bye

This isn’t even akin to a god or no god argument either. Because in that I’d be arguing something equates god. Here I’m simply observing something for what it by definition something is.

Oh, except physics right? @matildens that’s immaterial. EVEN IF nothing were ever discovered as immaterial it wouldn’t wouldn’t discredit the argument.

Because it’s based around observation.

Disprove rather.

But that’s irrelevant anyways, because to claim that nothing has been discovered to “just be” is a falsehood. If that was so, then tell me why gravity exists.

Calm it spielberg

Gravity exists cause of the universe laws that we haven't discovered yet