@Armaz Kavkaz
Oh lord, I immediately know why this is controversial. I'll try to remain as objective and neutral on this topic as possible. It's not hard to see, especially after one of the arguments, that this is clearly something that transcends just this particular issue, and is more involved with certain external and opposing political groups. That, combined with legitimate and illegitimate arguments on both sides, makes this controversial. EDIT: That and how the Administration handled it.
Ultimately, on the matter of the article itself, it is just a matter of policy, that being in this case whether it's relevant or not. Granted, I can see this being done tastefully, if there is a legitimate reason for it beyond people having their heads in the gutter. That said, I'm not aware of such a reason, as the body part in question has never been a serious part of the franchise, and thus it's very likely that it's not important with respect to the Star Wars lore. On that fact alone, it probably shouldn't be on the site. It does appear that from the art that this wasn't handled tastefully either, which on the grounds of vulgarity and decency, should have it removed as well. Unless there is honestly information that is relevant to the lore and important enough to consider, and it is handled tastefully, it likely violates the spirit of the relevancy rules, if not the rules themselves.
