Message from @IXI
Discord ID: 641882205353934878
that gain nothing from it
what does one gain from exposing the truth about vaccines ????
seems you dont gain anything
but if youre in the medical industry you might lose your job
You loose more than you gain
exactly
Most doctors have license revoked
who benefits from the lie
And earn nothing conpared to what they can potentially earn
the vaccine companies do
They give up financial freedom for the truth
big pharma
https://www.pnas.org/content/112/40/12498.long here's Gadad et al funded by antivaxxers. No points for guessing what they find ||no connection||
Like why do studies matter here. Learn what mercury does to a human body. Then you can understand that injecting mercury is harmful
Whats the body mechanism to excrete methylmercury from its system? Specially in such high doses for a tiny childs body
I think it's kind of unethical to kill so many monkeys to disprove an already disproven hypothesis, but they wanted to keep investigating for some reason
and you wanted proof, and you got it
@IXI mercury =/= thimerosal
Still contains mecury
and water contains oxygen. Doesn't mean water is oxygen
The monkey studies were proven to be a super biased. Besides humans are not monkeys, different organism react to certain viruses in a total different way.
But killing a billion monkeys would still be more ethical than having a large portion of human population autistic
How can you say they're biased when they were done by antivaxxers but disproved their hypotheses. Huge credit to them for having the integrity to admit what they found
Yes water contains oxygen, if oxygen was a toxic element than water would have been toxic
rhesus macaques are frequently used to study neurological toxicity. they're one of the best models we have
fine! table salt contains chlorine. Chlorine is a toxic element. table salt is not
It actually is
But in the amounts we take it we are fine
same with water
Eat a pound of saly youd end up in a hospital
@Sloan Jask very first reference is garbage as usual
References
↵Hansen SN, Schendel DE, Parner ET (2015) Explaining the increase in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: The proportion attributable to changes in reporting practices. JAMA Pediatr
jama really
Yes chlorine in the water makes the water toxic. And we absorb quite a lot of it
got any others who are not funded by big pharma
If the only issue you can find is "one of the references is published in a journal I don't like" you should try harder
JAMA, AAP etc all bs propaganda
come on man, this isn't funded by big pharma. This was funded by Ted Lindsay Foundation, SafeMinds, National Autism Association, and the Johnson and Vernick families
@Sloan Jask i dont need to try harder my sources dont have a conflict of interest
@Sloan Jask it is if they use references from jama really
Gadad et al doesn't either. You just proved my point that you fabricate conflicts of interest whenever you don't like the findings