https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31208472

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31287523

that's a few from the first page of pubmed

first is not a double blind placebo test

and yea that is a bs government web site that is only going to push the agenda

like the cdc aap etc

you know those that take money from vaccine companies

I don't know what else to say other than yes, it is a double blind placebo controlled trial

here we go with the ad hominin again 😦

refer back to Gragam's

yea that is fake as hell lol oct 16 2019 lol after we pointed out there was never a test done this has been posted long before it was posted

are you serious

so this is a brand new test lol

funny how that happens after years of us saying they have never done it hahahahaha

what year did you ask?

and them never actually doing it

read the dates on it

i have been posting this for over the last 6 months

hahahaha

more damage control

😂

gotta love it

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420116

here's one from 2018

I don't get what you're saying

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30292744 another from >6 months ago

these studies existed before you asked the questions

they're VERY easy to find

failing to have found them (demonstrated by asking these questions) says a lot about the person who's looking

these questions have been asked since 2009 lol

and like i said i dont take what they say as truth either way too much research that says they are liars and we know they have conflicts of interest to keep this going

you gave me government

the very ppl who HAVE to lie about it

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19175878 here's one from 2009

also the authors in the pubs are from colleges that get funding from supposed research that benefits the college. it is called advocacy research you prove what they want you to prove and you keep getting the funding

have you ever heard of following the money trail?

and that was not for a vaccine actually lol

did you read them

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19095024 here's a meta analysis of 9

pre 2009 a might add

I don't know what else to say other than that these studies exist no matter what you say