Message from @Sassy Undeniably
Discord ID: 648015131598520321
The fact most of the results are usable as tools is coincidence
And may indicate a fundamental logic to the laws of nature
Nah math is something we use to describe terra that we manipulate into other objects. To much weight it given to it. For example you say 1+1=2 but to me it equals 44 and so forth. That is how you reach a new level of understanding when it comes to math. It is a tool to be manipulated just like any other.
We call two the Successor of 1. It is defined as 1+1
Our disagreement is an issue of definition
If you agreed with my definition you'd have to call 1+1 = 2
Thats the logic to it
no because the first number to be argued is 0
?
irrelevant
1 is defined as the successor of 0
Not
lol
nope
I defined it as such
Just now
O is the first number and 1 is 2 and so forth
If you were working with my definitions you would be forced to agree with me
Otherwise you'd be illogical
Thats the logic about it lol
I can ascribe any amount to a number
It is you who want to stand for only one thing
But it is not so
In my reality 0 is the first number 1
I am declaring this
2 is the succesor of 1, that is 1 + 1 = 2
If you agree with this definition
You must agree 1 + 1 = 2
No sorry by the time you count to three I have 4 of something and you are behind
1+1=3
So you are declaring the successor of 1 to be 3
We have a disagreement in naming things lol
Not a disagreement with the logic
why do you say logic
my logic is sound
Nothing is a number
it is called zero
I literally said your logic was sound
Well
Valid