@RoundEarther Science doesnt prove stuff. Your experiment is evidence that Newton's Law holds as a valid model in your experiment.

If you assume universality (That the laws of physics are the same everywhere or something like this) you can say you have high confidence Newton's laws will hold if you preform your experiment 100 ft to the left or 10000 ft above

Follow the instructions at the beginning of the proof

cringe

Some people prefer the "biological" God type thing

Judging from your comment i take it you didnt follow the instructions given. Newtons laws actually do hold universally, however we apply different conditions to them given the circumstances (under water, in the air, spinning around on a merry go roun)

And actually i can, i ran an experiment a while ago for a class, i can send you the data

Newtons laws dont hold in noninertail reference frames

Infact an inerital reference frame is by definition one where newtons laws do hold

They do, actually just finished doing this in class

Lemme see if i can write up the proof for it

I guess Newtons 3rd law would still apply in noninertial reference frames actuall

So only the 1st and 2nd

So imagine the your noninertial reference frame is like a camera view moving over your inertial reference frame.

They still hold as while viewpoint is changing

No they hold with the introduction of fictitious forces

Which are added ad hoc to make them work

When I launch an artillerly shell and the earth rotates under it, i see it move to the left or right in my frame on the ground

No forces are acting on it in those directions according to me, yet it moves in those directions

newtons laws dont hold

We just proved the existence of these so called "fictitious" forces, if there was something you dont understand i encourage questioning

So here we can see that the force of the earth acting on the artillery shell is so minimal that it would not dramatically affect trajectory

This is due to the mass of the earth being massively larger than that of the shell

https://i.imgur.com/i0rrTdu.png

By your definition noninertial reference frames do not exist because newtons first two laws always work

This is the section on noninertial reference frames from a classical mechanics textbook

Lemme see if i can think of a better way to explain it

I have my mechanics book in front of me right now, tho i appreciate the reference

FlatSmackers Playlists Google Drive💚RIP💚
All you could ever imagine showing the flat earth reality thousands of memes pdf's laser tests hundreds of links etc
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1o-A0BjaThVvpCHyasU0hIQkMWa4bseBu

If the earth is flat then explain cars

@Traildust85 wdym?

@Traildust85 if space exists explain NASA

😱

That's impossible

Mind if I asked what made you a flat earther? Were you always a flat earther? How did your peers react? I'm just curious.

I’ve been a flat earthier for a while but one of my friends asked me for proof it’s flat. What do I say?

for me it started with learning about why secret societies are so secret.

If you haven't studied that, it wouldn't occur to you how troubling it is that all the astronauts were freemasons.

Then there's Antarctica

I have to say proof it’s flat. When I say stuff like the picture above they usually just sigh. How do I get them to believe me

You can't get anyone to do anything