Message from @JoyCx
Discord ID: 645349130583015447
are you familiar with "photorealism" ? if not google it. one can paint a photo that is literally indistinguishable from a photograph
you cannot tell the difference
and since nobody knows what the surface SHOULD look like
it doesnt matter
but that wasnt invented back then no?
yes. where i live in Switzerland we have one of the largest collections of art in the world. there are paintings from the 1600s that are photorealistic
it's amazing
you literally have to get 3inches from them to tell they are paintings
How do they make an image move
With like a gaint projector in the sky?
you mean the moon? or the NASA videos?
Moon
that we don't fully understand. we don't have the budget to fund R&D necessary
give us NASAs circa $20 billion budget and I can answer all your questions
but from the data we can access it supports a non solid moon model
wait so u say we didnt have technolegy back then
it wasn't us
read Genesis
Wdym
it's the most scientifically accurate book ever written. that coming from a PhD scientist and former atheist over 20 years
?
the Bible
Genesis 1
the creation story
is 100% correct
science
in fact I'm writing a book about it
and possibly YT channel
wait so cuz 1 person wrote something and a 100 people record something.. doesnt the 100 look more solid evidence
Personal question i got ^
what do you mean by "100 people record something"?
Like alot more people worked so hard to fake something?
Its weird
like why
it's not when you think about who (((they))) are
and why they would lie
using the bible as source of evidence <:confused:625494374402228244>
I didn't say that.
I said the data suggest the moon is not solid
ya but they need a reason