It was possible at the time @Batcon

Clearly wrong numbers smh

"I see something wrong so I reject it because I didn't look into it at all"

They could have made it a lot better quality if they wanted

@Dear Mason they didn’t have the technology to create the parallel lighting the sun created in the photos though

It wasn't possible at all?

Are you sure about that?

Yes

I am

You would need a very big light and a light that big up close would be blinding

They seemed to do it in fine in space movies at the time

Example?

Let me see if I can find out

Alrighty

Actually I might misunderstand

s o l a r f i l t e r

Refraction from the water droplets in clouds

Can you give me an example of "parrallel" lighting? @Batcon

also "ah! it looks wrong to me so it perfectly fits my model. I'm just gonnna say it's right without any real evidence besides my anecdote"

Sure let me see if I can find a good picture. Also I don’t. Know how to send them

observation is the beginning of the scientific method @mineyful

😉

you guys stop at the first step XD

and call it a day

because if you went past step one you'd debunk yourself

no you just ignore all the measurements and won't verify for yourself

no u

❤

And how does your model show the light bending?

FE are the ones with bendy lights

Send it to my private messages

er lasers

keyword-phrase: all my bent lights are from **clouds**

and can be observed no where else