Message from @Manimalia
Discord ID: 327966798072905730
Ethics?
to what extent
Ethnics. Vitally.
Do you mean like
Ethnic demographics?
Yes.
I would say that it is highly context-dependent
Yes it is important
I believe the only way libertarianism can work is a one-race society
or at least a similar iq/behavior mix
I dont care what label you give the society or economy, a homogenous society will flourish.
yes
it always does
and you need a monoculture, multiculturalism is a myth
of course
multiculturalism is just monocultures living separate from each other in the same society
India is multicultural. And its practically a failed state.
India was also a colony though
it has lots of hurdles to jump
homogeneity is a benefit to a flourishing society, not a guarentee. you can have a shitty country with one ethnicity
take most african countries, islamic countries, china for example
China is the only strong society of that list.
i dont mean strong, i mean good as in virtuous, fully functioning
If the one ethnicity is shit
Still china is the best of vitue and functionality.
It will be shit
and also you can have a non-shit ethnicity and still have a shit country (sweden)
This is true
it's not a guarentee by any stretch
As a baseline you need racial homogenity
From there you can still fuck it up
We need something to last for 1000 years. All else has failed and led to our destruct.
i suppose there are other systems that could work with a more diverse population
just not libertarianism
or direct democracy
How about based on fascism, but fluid with the times.
Well crap, these guys from that thread?
hmm?
Fascism is historically the best system/worldview