Yeah no call for hacking people,with catanas

Agree on that one

anywhere, except medieval Japan maybe.

gotta let the doggo out, be back tho!

bk

https://twitter.com/i/status/1158015415886516224

So the Dayton shooter was a self described leftist that praised Satan. Unreal. Your cant make this stuff up.

Welcome to New Right Network's Discord server, <@!463424656267804692>!

hi

hi

Welcome to New Right Network's Discord server, @Vector-06C!

https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1158165233858502656

I haven't looked to much into whether this is true or not. But it is interesting none the less.

hi

You notice all the attacks are in key electoral states?

right before a primary election too...

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/breaking-the-dayton-terrorist-was-a-self-described-leftist-according-to-his-twitter/

https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/name/connor-betts-obituary?pid=169819779

suposedly the Dayton shooter named died in 2014.

big can o worms coming update: Supposedly now all just an error from a different middle initial. D vs S. lol we'll see

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/08/04/dayton-shooter-leftist-elizabeth-warren-fan/

Welcome to New Right Network's Discord server, <@!427577227907956757>!

Welcome to New Right Network's Discord server, @2Alpha!

HEY FOLKS🙂

https://truepundit.com/wray-welcomes-peter-strzok-back-to-fbi/

#OrangeToo

I've been struck by orange man

Orange politics bad

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-texas-shooting-8chan/cloudflare-terminates-8chan-as-customer-on-hate-filled-content-ceo-idUSKCN1UV08G

They are wiping out all speech for the acts of a few. How draconian. Like Gab.

Welcome to New Right Network's Discord server, @KFrank (BaeFrank)!

Welcome to New Right Network's Discord server, @crabby!

Question from a right libertarian: What makes a baker refusing service to a gay couple different from a social media company refusing service to a conservative person?

if they can easily find another service not much. when those who hate free speech enter in a cartel and prevent others from providing services also, it becomes problemmatic.

see Gab's situation.

are you supposed to make your own internet because nobody will host you?

But here’s the thing: If a company owns a website and is offering speech as a service, what right do you have to demand that service, when social media companies are private and not public?

Just like how a person who walks into a bakery isn’t entitled to the right to buy something, you aren’t entitled to speech on a website that is owned and operated by someone else. I feel it is their right to block content, though I don’t like them doing this myself. I

You propose that only government supplied infrastructure should host free speech? Oh wait, they do own the infrastructure. How dangerous is relying on GovNet for all your dissent?