high variance will lead you to doing the same over and over and doing only whats best to reduce said variance

Maximizing your chances of getting good shit yes

And why the stunting gameplay?

Seems to me like I'd be stunting if you kept playing against noobs

because its essentially at a hold

But if you're actually play against good/players the same rank as you for the first time you gonna get your ass handed to you which would force you to git gud

some might call it "tactical"

I totally agree it's fucking boring but I mean it's how you win the game

The devs should make it more engaging

you cant really, these problems will exist

Okay then

its just inherent

Why would the playerbase ever stop being "tactical"

I understand

It's just how the game is best played

Can't fault the players for playing to win lol

obviously

It's the reason I don't play BR games I personally find it to be boring af at some stages in the game

Ofc varies from game to game

But some people do like BORING/tactical gameplay so

Would you also call Arma 3 boring?

no

It's just how you play the game

Why not

thats why i put tactical in quotes

You sit in a helicopter for 30 min just to get to a battle lol

I'd rather kms but I won't deny some people enjoy it

And good for them

It does NOT make the concept as a whole, BR for ex, objectively unfulfilling.

i dont think you quite understand it

its not the existence of pauses, its about why they are there and what they lead to

The players have figured out the system

And are having fun

It leads to fun for them

Lol

its like im talking to a wall

No you're pushing your subjective opinion as objective truth lol. Fulfillment is inherently subjective and super personal.

and i redacted it slightly

If a girl sucks dick down the street for a living and a guy discovers the cure to every cancer over his life which one would you call more fulfilling lol

Neither of them

I just dont quite get the "normie problem"