Message from @Capitán Alatriste
Discord ID: 574659240720072728
Well your both wrong. They have found Roman forts deep into north africa
Still doesn't mean there's black Germans lol
Well of course not
I was just noting that the misnomer that the Romans kept relatively close to the shore is a falsity.
Oh, no. That wasn't my point lol
Someone earlier said that blacks had always been in Germany, and there's no native Germans.
@Fitzydog why do you think it's called `schwarzwald` ?
because of the niggers that lived there
<:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>
<:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki
Yes they have found Roman forts in Africa. *How old were those forts?* What I am trying to get across is a sense of scale. In Sumer starting in 4100BC, in Egypt about 3000. We don't get to the *Greek Dark Ages* until 1200BC. Again for scale the Olmec had already happened at this point (1500BC) n the other side of the planet without other Med cultures to learn from. The city of Rome was founded in 800BC. So yess there are Roman forts in Africa. There are *American* forts in Aafrica too.......
So statements like "the Egyptians were more Greek" is kind of like telling your grandfather that he inherited your son's eyes......
<:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>
That's a black man
he looks so kind
i love him
A time where you could drag a broad by the hair from the enemy cave into your own without having to listen to her bitch for the rest of your life
Inventig language was a mistake
@Jym that was a moronic take.
I was talking about the Roman empire. Not whatever bs revisionism insanity your after.
Oh btw China predates sumar. So get fucked.
So by your logic. Everyone is chinese.
Yea it was stupid
By the little I gleamed just more of the we quiz kangz revisionism
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki
It's not revisionism to say the the historical record follows the rules of linear time chief.
It is when you invent new things that never happened and ignore other data champ.
Because per your "linear time" China was first. So everyone was chinese?
China was too distant to affect Med civilization. As were the Olmec. I kind of assumed everyone knew basic geography, my bad.....
Acktwually... Chinese silver imports in exchange for silk exports did affect the Mediterranean civilisation
Though distant, the Roman empire did trade with the Early Chinese dynasties, and the most eastern Hellenic kingdoms such as Baktria did have some contact
In which era? There was also cross traffic with ore from Afghanistan. Again I'm establishing timeline and distance. Hellenic, if you look up top there, is a few thousand years after the beginning of these civilizations.
So yes it would be even more preposterous to say "the Chinese were more Greek back then."
lmao
But it's not preposterous to think Europe was a black kingdom.
Chronologically that would be hard to assert. Kingdoms, in Europe, are incredibly recent within the scope we are talking about here.
So no we wuzznt Kangs. There is no need to trade one revisionist narrative with a different revisionist narrative.....
We wuz Chieftans and sheeiit
I was using kingdoms hyperbolically
I'm joking a bit myself. I mean how do you even categorize that going back 4-6 thousand years? I was listening to some paleobiology lectures at work last week and they thing the Vitamin-D synthesis mutation maybe be more recent (recent being tens of thousands of years in that context) than we think.
Invicta does good stuff