Message from @haserd2
Discord ID: 569652556150865920
<:GWcorbinTopKek:384871333705678868>
tl;dr did crush the pink tax myth as it not a tax, you are buying two totally different products that are made for the same purpose
Calling it a tax is wrong, but like, female products cost a bit more. But theres an easy solution, and its to just stop buying the overly expensive stuff.
I dont really watch tl.dr but I'll give him a watch
There are superior products so they cost more
@Amir *inferior products actually
Women are free to use "men" products and save money
woman do want to pay for the "premium" products so that is why they are marketed to woman more
this one seems to be pretty good
yeah. some products just arent superior however. Razors and clothes are some of those things. People buy for the brand and not for the product.
Dont your government make anything about it? @Cirno
Surely there is something
Superior from the point of view of wahmen
<:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>
Yes agreed. Women do pay more for premium products.
im looking for it, but im not sure what organisations look into that
Its like teenage boys with brand clothing too.
There is a government website for that sorta thing
Has to be
Trying to give context at a dinner party
The official story is that not a single worker was present so....
i mean, there is an obama study into that...
cant find much else on it
obama and anything is a joke at this point. he did make problems much worse
I can't find it though
Ik
AND EVEN WORSE the few government sites im looking into ARE DEAD LINKS! what the FUCK
You decide for urself.
The official story is no doubt horseshit
Right I just wanted to find the video again
Idk if someone still has a link to it
<:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>
<:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>
<:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>
<:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>
>it makes people uncomfortable
does it really tho