You don't have to like it.

@Ondsinet I mean a fetus would fit in those definitions

Conflating the two does nothing except cause arguments

@Fitzydog science has very specific terms and definition so

A fetus fulfills EVERY criteria of a parasite.

@Capitán Alatriste different species

I'm not making a moral argument.

@Ondsinet He's conflating the two just to make us argue

Cause he's a fucking kike

@Fitzydog
@Grodd
@Capitán Alatriste

Sorry too long

1 min

?

Oh nvm

`There are at least 10 scientific distinctions between a parasite and a fetus (bolds & italics added for easy perusal):

A parasite is an organism of one species that lives in or on an organism of another species and receives nourishment from the host.

Parasites are invasive organism that come from an outside or external source. A fetus comes from an inside or internal source (ie fertilized egg)

Parasites are generally harmful to the hosts, fetuses may make a pregnant woman experience adverse health effects, but not nearly to the same level that a parasite generally does.

A parasite makes direct contact with the host's living tissues. A fetus lives in the placenta, fed by the umbilical cord, both of which are fetal tissue (ie the cells come from the baby).

When a parasite invades a host, the host tissue will usually respond by encapsulating the parasite in order to cut it off from other surrounding tissue. In the case of a fetus, the mother’s tissue will create a lining tissue that connects, rather than cuts off contact with other tissues (placenta lining).
`

`
Parasites usually elicit a surge of antibodies as an immunological response. With the fetus, however, a mother’s trophoblast (the shell of cells surrounding the embryo) will naturally block these antibodies so as not to reject the fetus. This reaction is only found in the embryo-mother relationship.

A parasite will generally weaken the cellular reproductive capacity of the host.For a fetus, the effect is the opposite.

Parasites generally stay with the host for life, a fetus leaves upon birth.

Parasitical relationships are mostlyharmful and unnecessary to the host, generally damaging the host in a variety of ways. A newborn (fetus post-birth) is very healthy for the mother, bringing benefits of an emotional, cognitive and chemical nature.

The most obvious one, a fetus is a human being in development. It will never become anything other than human. Even a first trimester fetus will have fully developed arms, legs, ears, facial features, sex organs and a functioning heart, as well as sufficient neurological development to feel pain. A parasite is not a human and never will be.`

A fetus isn't a parasite

These are irrelevant invented distinctions to specifically exclude fetuses and have no biologically valid reasoning. Your propaganda is rejected.

@Grodd yeah sure

Fuck those scientists and their objective facts

<:GWjiangoOmegaLUL:389904150886088723>

My feelings are so much more important

These aren't objective facts though, what you posted is nonsense propaganda.

It's literal facts lol?

It's not though.

It's propaganda.

Which part?

All of what you just posted, idiot.

Those are not facts, those are propaganda.

They're justifications to exclude a fetus from being a parasite. The ONLY purpose of any of those statements, and some of them are factually wrong.

So a fetus will stay inside the mother forever?

@Ondsinet He's just using his Jew magic

Not typically, but parasites don't always stay with the host forever.

Fetuses aren't fed through the umbilical cord?

Well ok

Dude, fuck off with your propaganda nonsense.

<:GWjiangoOmegaLUL:389904150886088723>

It's nonsense justification for your feelings.

You can LIKE the parasite all you want.

It's still a fucking parasite.

By definition.