Like my other problem is net neutrality and I don't actually know where I fall on that debate. Because again it's access to the internet b

What I don't like is the contract changes that happen on-the-fly, and wouldn't stand up in court under 'Reasonable expectations'

I mean I have a very small online profile

I mean Google still probably has a massive file on me.

One moment, you're enjoying a website that uses banner ads for income, the next, all the ads are gone, but your data is being sold to other companies, but you didn't agree because you 'signed' an older contract when you joined

I except these companies to do these things and I also understand why they do what they do.

@Shurik See, the average person DOESN'T expect that.

Greed and exploits of other humans is the default state of humanity

It doesn't mean we don't have a massive capacity for good. It's just our default state is not good. And it's much easier to slide down into evil than to do good.

We have contract law for a reason. If I'm living in a land of laws, I expect them to be enforced broadly.

If not, might as well not have it

Yes I want rule of law but some shitty behaviors shouldn't be illegal.

They should just be socially unacceptable.

Obviously that's not stopping anyone

This kind of data mining and exploitation should fall under the 2nd catagory. Though a good case could be made either way.

Google seems to have successfully privatized the communist revolution from the looks of it lol

Good for them.

It'll bite them in the ass soon enough assuming the government doesn't make them a monopoly.

My god, you Russians are nihilistic lol

I'm not that nihilistic.

I like to think of myself as a realist. Who bets on the worst possible outcome.

Because if someone can go wrong it will.

It's a law of nature.

<:pepe_hang:460603218766987298>

Nature is a bitch trying to kill you and make it as painful as possible.

Which is why we created societies

The problem with humans is that the majority of them don't care if that happens to you, assuming that you don't take them down with you, because they are busy enough keeping nature off there backs.

That was a run-on sentence but I'm too tired to fix it.

Society is there to keep nature off everyone's back, and delegate it to someone else

A part of nature.

More or less kicking the can down the road.

Yeah, that's nihilistic as fuck.

🤷🏻

I mean entropy

Eventually it wins. Hopefully not for a good long as time. And I want to make that as long as possible.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/cop-forgets-oath-constitution-filming/

Isn't he technically correct? Considering that California is a 2 party consent state.

Hmm... I'm curious if that applies to public employees on duty

http://resources.uscannenbergmedia.com/2016/08/videotaping-and-recording-in-public-in-california-the-basics/

http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations

"Remember, even if you’re in public, you cannot record conversations between two people unless you have their permission.  This includes conversations that you’re one of the parties to.  If one person in the conversation can reasonably expect his or her conversation to be confidential, this standard applies.

If the person is standing on a soapbox on a corner, it does not. If the person is attending a government hearing and is speaking, it does not.  If the person is shouting, yelling, or speaking to a large group of people without apparent concern for who might overhear him or her, it does not."