Message from @desert hamster
Discord ID: 602632990996299808
i used the wrong word
i dont know the proper one
The article's language intentionally wants to spread fear and hate just by a quick look
we say duck
Progress marches ever forward, to an unknown utopian end
to work people up
then they will make a new version
they will tell the newspaper
that nothing will change
the newspaper will say it
no one will complain
and here are some new rules and regulations
agitate *agitational* ?
@Capitán Alatriste It's not about the 'language' of this article.
it's the entire ideology behind it. Most people on this server despise globalism and centralized power and value Localism, distributed authority, and the right of cultures to determine who is allowed into their territory
The EU is in direct opposition to this on every level
its like the soviet union and yugoslavia did not teach them a thing
No of course not
you cant force togetherness
They literally believe they can make a united states of europe
it's retarded
but this is just too fast
in 200 years it will happen naturally
Probably never. Just look at how many dialects there are in England alone
not talking about dialects
talking about bringing nations closer
It's a proxy
For culture
Becoming the One will never be natural. People from different backgrounds who are clearly incapable of coexisting isn't going to change ever.
nothing stays the same forever
people change
You CANNOT build a multi-cultural nation. It does not work.
England has been around for centuries and it STILL has dialects.
That's an indication that the various subcultures within England still have not blended together into a monoculture after all this time.
Just image how much more difficult it would be with countries like Spain, France, Germany and Italy
what is happening now is lunacy
Since the dawn of time it's been like that.
"Bu bu bu but look at the US. They made it work"
No, we started out as several closely similar monocultures who expanded into unclaimed territory
Depends on what you mean by change. The British changing into Somalis is a BAD CHANGE whilst Somalis changing into British is obv desirable. The EU promotes and pushes changes that are negative, go against liberty and freedom of the locals.
I wouldn't consider that 'desirable' tbh lol
it's all relative
desirable would be to purge off the somalis
If a nigga can change and there's non negros with open arms I got no issues
Based