Message from @Almagafor
Discord ID: 634665146165231617
But the government could take it away
Whether or not he cared or not doesn't change anything...
espicially if they are fucking tyranical theifing cunts
You understand how delegationists and uncentralized these empires were ffs
He kept the country stable, by whipping out a pistol and shooting some random person in the crowd every time he spoke publicly <:Commie_ball:466404411535785995>
Who did that
At least point to somebody who actually did that
If I'm getting shot in the head and I DON'T CARE does that mean I'm not getting shot in the head? What sort of logic is this...
Chinese Empire was a tyrannical regime as well, and it was remarkably stable with brief periods of conflict
Nicolae Ceaușescu
Man, this guy never saw braveheart
What?
SMH
Chinese Empire?
In the USA, you can be shot in a head even if it isn't a tyrannical empire
Are you fucking joking?
BY N....
You mentioned another earlier, Muammar Gaddafi
That a whol diffrent concept
Saddam might have, but i cant confirm
Muammar Gaddafi didn't shoot a person ffs
@JayJS To the same degree as in the middle east? What the fuck.
He is saying you could get shot by government, you say you get shot by hillary clinton
Yuan dynasty was stable for several centuries
For a longer time that US has been stable
US has been stable for 150 years, and that's already a REMARKABLY LONG TIME
Well the US hasnt existed long enough to make that claim
Are you claiming you aren't more safe being in North America, generally speaking, than you are in the middle east? Kek
So... the mongols
No
Fucking logic
Im confused as to wtf youre on about
I am claiming that historically, most empires were far less impactful and oppressive for an average citizen than modern day USA
This whole chat is a clusterfuck
An average roman citizen felt the power of the government far, far less than a modern US citizen
Well thats apples and bowling balls
Roman Empire was a tyrannical empire
same rate they fall
YES
THEY WHERE