Message from @LumpyAcidFish
Discord ID: 470154307388571648
from a business point of view it would be nuts to drop it
natural gas is like the runner up
^who cares
but from an environmental view it would be wise for such a large country
theres 2 sides to everything
also despite what everyone thinks the united states leads the world in environmentalism
mostly because of all the empty land we have
alot of science goes into environmentalism
shit like that
it adds up
tbh I'm not even mad about the US environmental effects anymore
all the dirty industries were moved to asia a while back
the Asian countries are the worst offenders
the epa cleaned up most of america in its prime
natural parks are still a thing
and scientists in this country are working on resurrecting dead species
more are saving important ones on the brink like the black footed ferret
i dont see that kind of dedication go into other countries
maybe australia
Taiwan
bitchin to us to be more progressive
meanwhile they cut down their forests for fire wood
at that point you are no better than brazil
burning wood for energy is like middle age tech
yeah atleast we burn trash for heat here
did you know
how radiactive is coolant for reactors btw?
uh
not that radioactive is it?
radiation dissipates
idk i would have to look into it honestly
pump that shit through central heating instead
and build a few more nuclear plants
problem solved
in Sweden they could just up their productivity from 20% to 80%
no one wants to do that because coal is still better at producing energy than nuclear
they're pretty much turned off now
nuclear will produce more than coal in the long run because a uranium rod lasts longer than a piece of coal
but that piece of coal give a huge bang for its buck
sure it does