Message from @Onyxdood

Discord ID: 488559662652981250


2018-09-10 03:41:33 UTC  

Is a wiretap a warrantless search, or not?

2018-09-10 03:41:42 UTC  

Give me a damn moment Ma

2018-09-10 03:41:48 UTC  

Fuck I don't shit sources

2018-09-10 03:53:11 UTC  

Does anyone have a link to the Swedish elections

2018-09-10 03:58:50 UTC  

Well fuck. I come with 2.
I didn't realize the NSA has been around since 52.
However, the part we are focusing on didn't start in earnest until 2010.
The Abruptness means the companies already had the infrastructure to do this.
As well calls themselves (As in recordings of) seems rather washy if they actually do that outside of calls "Recorded for Training Purposes" kinda thing. The FCC has regulations on this as well.
Recording Calls: https://www.techwalla.com/articles/how-to-retrieve-phone-conversations-on-verizon-wireless
https://engineering.mit.edu/engage/ask-an-engineer/are-cell-phone-conversations-stored-somewhere-and-are-they-retrievable/

2018-09-10 03:59:08 UTC  

'52?

2018-09-10 03:59:10 UTC  

Damn son

2018-09-10 03:59:29 UTC  

Yea the agency was far different back then

2018-09-10 03:59:39 UTC  

And there's been rumors of the NSA wiretap rooms being around for almost 2 decades

2018-09-10 04:00:13 UTC  

It's been almost 2 decades since 2001. lol

2018-09-10 04:00:24 UTC  

Yes, but earlier than 2010

2018-09-10 04:00:27 UTC  

We were talking cell phone database recordnings

2018-09-10 04:00:50 UTC  

The shit you signed the right to over to private companies

2018-09-10 04:00:53 UTC  

Oh, I was talking physical infrastructure

2018-09-10 04:00:57 UTC  

Floki delivered on citations

2018-09-10 04:01:07 UTC  

The shit Snowden whistle blowed

2018-09-10 04:01:15 UTC  

I usually do, but just not quickly

2018-09-10 04:01:30 UTC  

Cause I like to be precise and check multiple.

2018-09-10 04:01:36 UTC  

My man

2018-09-10 04:01:40 UTC  

👌 👌 👌

2018-09-10 04:02:14 UTC  

I was hoping for something not wikipedia

2018-09-10 04:02:17 UTC  

To be frank

2018-09-10 04:02:27 UTC  

1) Wiki
2) Doubt it didn't exist for actual legal survellance

2018-09-10 04:02:39 UTC  

"legal surveilance"

2018-09-10 04:02:52 UTC  

You know, against actual Terrorist Cells, ect.

2018-09-10 04:03:03 UTC  

There are LEGAL forms of surveilance

2018-09-10 04:03:15 UTC  

Half the US is on a list these days, tbh

2018-09-10 04:03:38 UTC  

No

2018-09-10 04:03:49 UTC  

Your confusing No Fly with Terrorist

2018-09-10 04:04:02 UTC  

ACTUAL Terrorist list isn't that large

2018-09-10 04:04:05 UTC  

You think they don't cross reference those two?

2018-09-10 04:04:31 UTC  

You can get on the No Fly for anything, Terrorist lists have actual reasons

2018-09-10 04:04:38 UTC  

How many degrees of separation did they say legally could be wiretapped?

2018-09-10 04:05:27 UTC  

Hey I gonna do a patrol, so I leave this discussion for another time.

2018-09-10 04:05:53 UTC  

Perhaps next time we can stay focused on rights vs the state

2018-09-10 04:06:07 UTC  

lol you can't tell me what to targue

2018-09-10 04:06:18 UTC  

<:what:382980756139409409>

2018-09-10 04:06:22 UTC  

When the NSA actually does what it is meant for, it does great work. like "The NSA has also been alleged to have been behind such attack software as Stuxnet, which severely damaged Iran's nuclear program."

2018-09-10 04:06:23 UTC  

Damn greyfags