something like "Let's assume Milo's relationship was beneficial for him. It's still illegal, and should be broadly, because it protects more than it harms (assuming Milo's statement is factual)"

i dont like writing walls of text

ill find u the clip

I mean, it's not like Sargoy himself posted it on his own channel

I got on discord because of BA's server, but then left after I found that they were unironic white nationalists

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMQ6b8MHRw4

10 minutes of context

👌

It was also about kids being able to understand what is going on. *it depends on the kid* soon after he clearly states age of consent should be 16 which it is.

That's a slippery slope man. Gives people ans out, too easy to sweep under the rug

So once again, and the context is broader as well (referring to Milo), it may *theoretically* be fine for one individual, but that is no excuse for lowering the age of consent

wow u're making excuses for blatant pedophilia

You're the one conflating a single situation with acceptance of pedophilia

he's clearly saying children should freely have sex with adults

Even that isnt really saying its fine. Its more agreeing that in milo [who was the kid] thinks it was fine. But affirming the age of consent is necessary

What do you want him to say "MILO! You're wrong, and brainwashed. We need to track down that priest and have him hanged, no matter what your opinion is "

Yes. Hes clearly saying that. And all metoo should be believed

Sarcasm...if you couldnt tell

You know, I take that back, because he sort of is still saying that in a way.

In no way did he say he supports the actions of said priest

ofc he didnt support the priest

but he's saying pedophilia can be fine

No, I don't think he's saying that at all

depends on the child

if he's into it

That is quite the gymnastics you are doing. Ironic when your boy Jim litterally asks about underage penises

who's jim

He never said "if he's into it" lol.

it follows

lmao. No he was talking about the other guy who said, "I had sex well under the age of consent". Not necessarily as a pediphile situation. The guy who said that was talking about 2 Underage kids having sex. That vid you linked EVEN showed that, but they tried to twist it in the commentary. You might relisten kiddo.

So his stance is clear:
2 underage kids: "Depends on the Child"
1 underage + 1 adult: "The age of consent is 16 and should be"

Go suck Metoker's dick

he didnt mention kids tho, might be a case of pederasty

y r u so mad

Yes it was in direct reaction to the other guy's statement

and wtf is metoker

You are undoubtedly familiar with Metoker.

You wouldn't otherwise be discussing this with us.

^

nah I saw shit posted on the athens discord

Ah, I see. It doesn't much matter who you learned it from. It's still misinformation.