Message from @SomeUser27
Discord ID: 567531676054585364
Plato?
Descartes
I mean, most of us, in one way or another.
I always feel strange when the news takes something I did and runs with it
look at these hypocrites:
https://i.imgur.com/EMkE3I3.png
"I think, therefore I am"
I got a lot of heat a few weeks ago for a simple question
Excuse me, need to win an argument about emotes with a commie <:sargoy:382978736053551104>
I wonder if nobody else ever asked?
omegalul
orange man bad
orange man took our bumpstocks
orange man silly
i know and thats sad, and he seems cucking on the wall sadly
orange man call bullshit
me laugh
why am i not surprised that theguardian writer looks like a tub of mayonnaise?
Bumbstocks are for putting bullets down range as fast as possible while sacrificing accuracy so I see why they would be banned since they just cause damage since they can convert a single shot to “automatic” (not true automatic since it uses recoil)
"shall not be infringed"
ban illegal aliens not amendments
now dont get me wrong
bumpstocks are crap products
but
they should ban murders
its my goddamn right
@SomeUser27 What @thatguykyle said plus "belt loop"
imagine if it was illegal to hurt people
fingers too @H3llbender
why are progressives so retarded?
http://magaimg.net/img/7r32.jpg
why do they refuse to fuck off to Venezuela or Mexico?
rhetorical question
Progressives = cult of destroying the west
@thatguykyle I mean, can I mention lightning links in this server? There is a lot of stupid ATF things.
Boy that sentence was 1/3 keywords wasn't it?
Bump stocks are the not guns though, like I don’t wanna ban guns but a attachment that serves to just use the recoil to put a lot of bullets down range while being inaccurate, is why could be banned
fucking clown world
@SomeUser27 I don’t want to ban guns, just all the scary black parts
@SomeUser27 Can ban a lot of things, doesn't mean it is an intelligent thing to do nor does it mean it isn't an infringment to.