Message from @Fitzydog

Discord ID: 621199083738103818


2019-09-11 04:16:51 UTC  

my main point is, youtube only doesnt make money because its free to watch and to upload to

2019-09-11 04:17:18 UTC  

and bitchute is only a shitty torrentbased site because they must have like no money

2019-09-11 04:19:28 UTC  

Here's my idea:

You've got a person who wants to watch videos
You've got a Web 4.0 social media host that keeps all your data for you, distributed among many servers that the company rents
You've got a video website
You've got a creator

The creator uploads a video pays for it to get hosted, and then the user watches the video. The user likes the video, and saves it to their host for seeding, which they pay for.

Now, the video is hosted from two seeds, the video site and the media host. The more popular it is, the more it's hosted, and eventually the creator no longer has to pay for hosting.

2019-09-11 04:19:59 UTC  

Uh, no.

2019-09-11 04:20:05 UTC  

Fuck you

2019-09-11 04:20:08 UTC  

users dont want to seed videos

2019-09-11 04:20:18 UTC  

Or pay to watch them. kek

2019-09-11 04:20:23 UTC  

especially when theyre the only party not making money on it

2019-09-11 04:20:36 UTC  

@Son of Rome You totally misunderstood what I said lmao

2019-09-11 04:20:39 UTC  

users will pay to watch videos, they already pay for netflix and hulu

2019-09-11 04:21:01 UTC  

^

2019-09-11 04:21:03 UTC  

The user is NOT PAYING TO WATCH VIDEOS

2019-09-11 04:21:18 UTC  

"The user likes the video, and saves it to their host for seeding, which THEY pay for."

2019-09-11 04:21:20 UTC  

if you don't know what web 4.0 is, just say something

2019-09-11 04:21:23 UTC  

well they should, fuggin deadbeats

2019-09-11 04:21:25 UTC  

They implying the user pays for it

2019-09-11 04:21:30 UTC  

*raises hand*

2019-09-11 04:21:36 UTC  

idk what web4.0 is

2019-09-11 04:22:18 UTC  

It's embedded social media, hosted privately.

Disqus is sort of like this in a rudimentary way

2019-09-11 04:22:28 UTC  

ah, thing nobody uses

2019-09-11 04:23:22 UTC  

So, you're not paying to watch videos. You're paying for a social media host, for all your comments, photos, videos, memes, whatever

2019-09-11 04:23:39 UTC  

You're just electing to use some of that space to host a video that you REALLY like

2019-09-11 04:23:50 UTC  

You can watch and never host

2019-09-11 04:23:51 UTC  

i like the first part, not the second

2019-09-11 04:24:14 UTC  

i have no incentive to seed other than to be charitable to a guy who is engaging in business

2019-09-11 04:24:27 UTC  

and why would i give a businessman charity

2019-09-11 04:24:46 UTC  

Maybe I want to see this guy make more videos?

2019-09-11 04:24:53 UTC  

especially when im already paying for the service

2019-09-11 04:24:54 UTC  

Same reason I share videos here

2019-09-11 04:25:08 UTC  

You're not paying for the video service though

2019-09-11 04:25:21 UTC  

The videos are free to watch

2019-09-11 04:25:33 UTC  

im paying for social media and the creator is profiting from that somehow

2019-09-11 04:25:44 UTC  

Nope

2019-09-11 04:25:48 UTC  

99.9 percent of torrenters are leeches

2019-09-11 04:25:48 UTC  

Unrelated services

2019-09-11 04:26:23 UTC  

I think youre reaching Mr. Panoptes

2019-09-11 04:26:41 UTC  

well the point is to be reaching, at least somewhat

2019-09-11 04:26:48 UTC  

we're trying to find solutions

2019-09-11 04:26:48 UTC  

The social media host is not a social media site. It's the same data to be used on many websites as you like, to be presented as you like, and you can revoke access whenever you like

2019-09-11 04:27:27 UTC  

Mornin lads

2019-09-11 04:27:28 UTC  

i dont think that would work at all though, im willing to pay, im not willing to seed