even if all it takes to build is one guy and $500

because it wont be built up to city codes and would probably cost you more in legal fees

They're paying it themselves dumbass

that's the diffeence

thats why thomas me boy

the city forces its' taxpayers to pay 65k

a company pays for it themselves

no the city breaks a deal with private companies

if they want to waste money on 65k stairs

tom this is an isolated scenario inspired by a real life event

that doesn't affect me

is this about that one situation in sweden where the dude fixes stairs in a park for about $300 and then the government takes down the stairs and replaces it with stairs that cost around 60k?

then pays said private fcompany 60 k

and it's the fact that the company is price gouging

^

SO wait who is paying N

DN

the home owner

obviously

this isn't a home

the middleman is the problem here

it's a scenario tom

when did we switch to homes

Ok

ages ago

pay attention

Alright so

if you own the home

yeah thomas

pay a tension

you'e not force to pay any company anything

you gotta get them by their last name

but you absolutely NEED those stairs

you're allowed to pick who you want to do your stairs

because you're a disabled old man

So go to happy joe's

he's doing it for cheap

we don't get to pick who the government chooses to work with

you cant, because the regulatory agency is contracted to stairco

happy joe goldshekelberg

that's what this whole SNC lavalin scandal was about