I shiggy diggy

meh if i get a new gun it'll be a luger p08

guys

is this a good conclusion

```In summary, women were not the only ones that were socially conditioned into their own gender roles, but also males were and are. And within that social conditioning, there is a link between femininity, masculinity and biology. Women were subjugated within these roles for many years, and only recently became less so. These novels show the in depth nature of how these relationships occurred and the very nature of male and female behaviour. Overall, Simone De Beauvoir may be right in most aspects, having a society that conditions one into becoming one with either more female or male socially accepted norms, though those accepted norms are tied to a biological nature that one cannot change at birth.```

I mgoing touch my pe pe

lol

i didnt talk about biology at all in my essay whoops

i forgot i wrote that

the absolute state of university education

i wrote this as a counter argument

```In some cases, these societal conditionings are still pervasive in today's society. There are women only clothing such as dresses, high heels, though these are only visual norms. In the western world, women have become integrated in society as an equal due to first wave and second wave feminism. Women can vote, do the same types of jobs males can, apply for university, with females applying three times more than males according to the independent () and other socially unacceptable things that would have been viewed unacceptable in the 1800’s. In the UK, there's a queen and a female prime minister. In the United States the democratic party's main running candidate was a female. In Russia, the Deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation is a female. The gender pay gap, which is the gap between the average earnings of income between males and females is often used to cite how women are still classed as under privileged due to male dominance. This argument can easily be debunked when the article put forth by the Center for American Progress and other articles that explain that the gender pay gay is the result of a free market and free choice. Occupational differences account for most explanations. Men and women choose to work in different fields and industries, and from this free choice there is born a perceived pay gap, which is nothing more than the state of the different choices between genders. By law, males are paid equally to females. By the principle of free market, corporations would like to see the highest amount of profit, which would mean hiring the best suitable candidates for each job. If there was a sexist state, females would be looked upon as unsuitable for jobs that males can fill. -```

``` - This does not happen in large in any western nation, and due to the Equality Act 2010 passed in the United Kingdom, corporations cannot hire or not hire anyone based on gender alone. Third wave feminism argue that there is still inconsistencies with equality and argues for equal rights given to males and females, with equal roles given to females. This would ironically require subjugating males and basing all hiring be on gender alone, which goes against feminisms original stance of not basing things on gender.
```

agree

cringe

incel cringelrod

@Gordon Frohman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvzXh9WV0rs

Soy.

@Punishedx2 Tinker Tom u gay irl

Violent alt right at it again

@elliot what if I told you that within feminism, the occupational discrepancy is a key aspect of their critique

not just a pay gap, but a total societal unconscious bias

OK whos the motherfucker whom grouped @FastJack 's server in with a bunch of right wing retards!!!!

I’m gonna dox my lift and cheek

Lip

Ok

I’m doxing

B

In

T

F

3

2

O

1

1

0

1