logical

>Everyone

>Except everyone who doesn't

🙄

Still unable to defend your position

you're not even debating about mental disorder anymore

you're only debating on weither canadians use it or not

which is irrelevant to the actual topic

Yes.

You are.

No.

This is literally what you are doing.

You haven't argued about the definition

you only argued

on what's usage in Canada

which is literally irrelevant

>muh DSMVEIVS

I don't really care about mental illness or its definition, I would like to expand your definition of "evil" to include the desire to have sex with children, even if it isn't acted on

>muh book

>muuh boook

>muuh canadian psychologists

>What do you mean actually speaking of what should constitute a mental illness?

>i have this pre-made opinion

Yes.

Because then.

Tom would have to face the fact

he is immoral

even if that non-action is the urge to hurt children

Thought crime is justice in this case.

You fear it

and you are right to fear judgement

if your thought were to be exposed

to the public

no law would protect you

>woah did you just say you're a fascist

>i can't believe it man

>what do you mean you want to enforce morality

>woahah that's so cringe bro

>cucked

how is hanging pedophiles cucked?

>the boot