Who’s next

If I am Expect a shit storm

<a:Fried:573555979539709965>

<a:Fried:573555979539709965>

That’s hot

@Dank cum in me

@Dank you should also remove old smirnoffs account from the list

ded server

smirnoff is my BFF

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/401576502711549964/577014696842887201/20190512020931_1.jpg?width=1202&height=677

where the fuck is amsalrm

@amsalem cuck invite me to ur server

If you like sports (literally any) pm me

I run a sports server as my main server nowadays

i wonder how many more people gona get hitted by ban wave

Don’t join that server

Their bunch of snowflakes

And I hate fucking using that word

But that’s what they literally are

@juhla-mokka your a Niger

No, you're a retard

You fucking weeb

I told you it was chill

I told you not to fuck around

What because I said weebs?

You decided to be a faggot

That’s all

Lol

And you don’t like my rat

Yeah, funny

@juhla-mokka be prepared to get fucked over Every chance I get

Ye ok

retart

?

English

You're a faggot

HOW

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.