Also. I really don't want to start an argument, I have no dog in this fight. I just wanted to see what the context for the verses given was

eh thats fair

just a funny meme

😄

did u hear the bad new

https://twitter.com/RealGrumpyCat/status/1129310647458467840

grumpy cat passed away

Didn't he die a couple years ago?

nah

must have been rumours

thats the offical twitter

Man. That's too bad.

yeah ik

😦

Gotta pour one out for the grumpiest cat around.

100% man

RIP

he died as he lived, grumpy

lol

I wasn't gonna look like a fool lmao

gotta remember, everyone who isn't you is your enemy

I don't subscribe to that notion.

it works out because the enemy of your enemy is your friend

so you still get a bunch of friends

<:woke:494355320223694848>

Way off topic, but I found out I can send gifs as messages via phone.

_what has science done_

also aren't we kinda in the process of replacing gifs with webm

They also take like 3 years to send.

webm's made correct are supposedly smaller than gifs though

unless you can count the number of frames on one hand

it's relevant because codec is reaching the point where it's outsizing gifs (as in, smaller outcome)

This is all way above my paygrade, friend.

https://techstacker.com/why-webm-is-superior-to-gif-video-comparison/FR6xLr2zHn9uSTTsH

So if I'm getting the gist:
Gifs are large, and cumbersome, and they are also very poor quality in regards to image.
Webms are small, and sleek, and has better picture quality.

yes, but the process of encoding is much more ehm powerfull and fully featured so

you can also purposely make a very large file with very bad settings for making the webm or if you don't care too much about it you'll get kinda average results

codecs are getting very strong, I download tv episodes in x265 a lot and that's like 300mb for a 1080p 45min video

Damn son. Tech isn't my strong suit, if I'm being honest. What I'm gathering is that webms are also more forgiving when it comes to formatting them?

I'm just about to go to bed.