Message from @Desimated
Discord ID: 608750919181533266
that much is confirmed
no, not confirmed
i beg to differ
your making connections that where not confirmed
about "confirmed" part
Q confirmed
and we ourselves can verify the connection between Q and potus
prof plz, where has Q mentioned "we are military intelligence"
in the drops
we are making the connections, we believe these facts as evident, but they are not confirmed
Btw, there is really no "safe space" for us skeptics to discuss latterly so I really appreciate the conversation @DaveyJones @Desimated
sauce
i think he said something like more then 8 less then 12 or something like that
no worries 😃
it's in the drops dude, search for yourself, i'm not likely to find it any quicker
ive read every single one of them i think
yeah @Thoutzan , is no worries, aslong as you dont get too reved up its good to have a discussion
but Q once dropped after being asked, might have been one of the Q&A sessions, that they are a group of high ranking intelligence people, mostly military
your the one that is stating it as fact @DaveyJones
i am referring to the drops dude
u want proof, that's where it is
well they are good enough for me
okay, so to be clear... Q HAS NOT CONFIRMED HE IS A GROUP OF MILITARY AND CIVILLIAN INTEL BIG WIGS+
imo he has
it is believe to be true, but it is not confirmed
the question is whether or not he told the truth
so dont state it as fact
and if you think about it there is very little that can actually be confirmed in the way you are demanding now
in life i mean
99% of our world views depend on assumptions
yes, but truth is not assumption, its factual
your truth, and my truth, is different then the factual reality of the verbage
well as i said: q factually confirmed it, but did not provide evidence
confirmed does not == proven
i too believe what you believe, BUT its belief and opinion not confirmation
confirmed just means another source gave you the same results
you said confirmed, not that we believe based on assumptions of Q's posts that he is "blah blah blah"
yeah but by standards that high you cannot even really disprove flat earth
well let me put it another way: is there another option that makes sense?
sat footage? world maps? physics of water / liquid mass in 0 g...