funny looking at his wiki

https://web.archive.org/web/20140216173745/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Ayyadurai
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Ayyadurai

this supposedly expands upon it

https://twitter.com/ElctionResearch/status/1326795752794951684

@RandomDiscordAccount if the dems can hack everything and flip elections and makeup millions of ballots, why didnt they just do it for hilary?

@guac ever heard of science?

> @RandomDiscordAccount if the dems can hack everything and flip elections and makeup millions of ballots, why didnt they just do it for hilary?
@BigBrainBrian The fuck do you mean hack? The dominion program that's used along with others is the main one being accused and we already have confirmation of flipped votes due to it's use. This is something that could easily have been prevented by having federal law mandate open source code for all the software that runs the tabulation machines and signature and name verifications. The reason there hasn't been a push for it is because of an antiquated supreme court ruling that limits the federal government in how it can mandate how states run elections. This ruling occurred when Republicans pushed for universal voter id requirements.

also, i like how you wont even look back on the Tim Pool conversation you were proven wrong on

Why didnt they do it for hilary if the dems can flip elections so easily

@guac good image ^

Why are right wingers crying so much

Where is the evidence for election fraud

There is none

@BigBrainBrian dude, are you just going off of platitudes?

first, tabulation machines software markets changed from 2016 to 2020

second, common laws changes that alleviates things such standards of signature verification

and third, the passing over of voter id laws through the greater use of mail invoting

Is this evidence or just vague conspiracies

there is no definitive proof of fraud but there is proof of foul play

definitive proof of foul play, yes

Yeah thats what I thought

Next

has there been a thorough investigation yet?

> Yeah thats what I thought
@BigBrainBrian you might genuinely be retarded?

Well youd have to have evidence rather than conspiracies to go to court

So thats your first mistake

> Is this evidence or just vague conspiracies
@BigBrainBrian false dichotomy fallacy

did you not see me type that there is proof of 'foul play'

proof of foul play hints at fraud

but it isnt conclusive

but i do have proof of the former

you were already smacked on the Tim Pool argument and it seems you want to repeat the process by jumping to strawmans again.

Look, if there was actual evidence, youd be screaming it from the rooftops, not like "welll uhhh something changed from 2016 to 2020 and uhh mail in ballots bad and uhh I wanna throat trumps 4incher uhh"

Like present evidence or move to a different topic

sure, PA and Michigan restrictions on proximity of poll watchers within democrat counties that didnt allow them proper view of the ballots

evidence of foul play

pretty obvious and clear

in prior elections, poll watchers and poll challengers could look over the shoulder of those counting the ballots and they could not this time due to proximity restrictions placed upon them with covid as the excuse.

that in of itself is foul play due to rendering the utility of poll watchers and poll challengers null

im losing braincells here