Message from @Tortoise22
Discord ID: 799305466873511956
I am
epic
Lol
Well that’s something.
Your iq is 139 but you do the most retarded stuff
Me
See no difference
@Reese I posted that
nerd
and I have it in my favorite gifs
Not to get to deep for no reason, but I feel like if you really believe the Bible and that there is a heaven and hell, you would do everything in your power to avoid shooting someone. Unless of course life was in immediate danger. https://discord.com/channels/707691030748594288/726922041424478218/799295569414717461
unless you believe in predestination
Lol that’s a worm can
<:Tucker:781196327559495720>
That's how she got where she is.
When her breast size is her iq raised to a power of 5
when she can commit suicide by jumping from her breast size to her iq
"If i wanted to kill myself, id climb up to your ego and jump down to your IQ"
Well yeah its one of the 10 commandments thou shall not kill. The bible even tells us if we see our enemy dying we shouldn't let them die, or eles we just as bad as them, and to treat others how we would like to be treated.
I thought it was thou shall not murder. Murder is the unlawful and premeditated killing of another human. I'll double-check but it could be a difference in translation.
And would self-defense count? If I were breaking into another man's house I would understand being shot. Is killing to protect others still wrong as opposed to standing aside and doing nothing while the innocent are at the mercy of whoever?
Not in Wyoming. If you witness another being attacked, by law you can defend them.
Yes... this is good.
But is it biblically?
it's a bit more complicated than that, there is a definition difference between killing and murder (in the bible)
murder is not just walking in the street, seeing someone and killing them, it's to prepare yourself, to specifically go and kill someone (yes, what you said, premeditated) self defense is not murder, and killing someone to protect someone else is also not murder
Can we make a meme template out of this?
Is it the extinguishing of life in general despite circumstances or are the circumstances where the taking of life is acceptable.
we already have one
Ah I see
I don't think that "acceptable" is the right word here, but yes, there is a difference in circumstances
Condonable? Mildly wrong? What is it? If there is another way that avoids violence do you have to take it even if there is a high likelihood of failure? My opinion is that it is a very case by case basis.
yes, it's a case by case basis, that's why we have judiciary system