Don’t get me wrong, I don’t like monopolies as much as you do. And Legalizing the ability to kill someone is infringing on their rights which is definitely wrong. Murder isn’t good. Also who cares if two guys want to love each other. Is that infringing on your rights? Are you so against another way of being happy or their liberty? Are you going to put them in prison for expressing their freedom? So the first amendment is nothing or the right to peacefully protest? You’re also talking about infringing on Due process here too, Think of the Case of Michigan V. Boomer. He couldn’t swear as it infringed on the modesty of women and children.

You’re saying all these things like people cannot have morals too.

Legality and Morality cross, but they are still different.

Cause the founding fathers knew, that monitoring Morality infringes on rights.

You are distracting the conversation by (fallaciously) framing this as a free speech issue (which it isn't, porn is not protected by the Bill of Rights) instead of as a morality issue on how a civilization's units should conduct themselves to promote a stable and moral society.

Banning porn is not "infringing upon my rights". You do not have a right to porn. Simple. The founding fathers didn't die for their country just so their men degenerate themselves to the point of cucking and simping for females and wasting their zeal for masculinity, and they certainly didn't die to let their daughters be enslaved with hard "empowerment" copium in the sex industry. Libertarians are as much a copium crowd as the left.

As long as you continue with this farse of a platitude, masquerading licentiousness as liberty; your movement will collapse and die out.

Being a degenerate is not expressing liberty, it's enslavement to your desires.

And that spreads like a plague to other people who fall for the psyop of degenerate media.

You will never achieve true liberty if your society promotes degeneracy under the guise of "liberty".

Than prove that with morality and not Legality. Hence why there is a Freedom of religion, people can still hold Christian morals and not infringe on the legality of the law.

There you go again conflating legality with morality.

Society cannot keep Christian morals if the people think promoting homosexual kinks and porn is "liberty".

They will collapse under their own moral degenracy.

Ok what do you define as liberty than?

And libertarians will predictably blame this on "big government".

Big government is the problem.....

Big government allows for corruption

Which ruins our economy with a false sense Crony capitalism

Liberty is the exercise of your free-will with a moral guide to stablize and self-discipline yourself to truly enjoy that which is truly Good and not the illusion thereof.
Very different from the AnCaps and libertarians "just be free, bro" definition.

Okay, mind if I introduce a case to you?

I want to see what you think about it

Might give me a clearer picture

No it's not, it's degenerates running government.
When people become too degenerate, government expands to overcorrect. Degenerates create big government, not the other way around.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjVBsqX7LU
Watch this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV6BSmibGAw
And this to understand the issue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjM70LYJlno
Also this, since it's related to porn.

ngl commie simps really gonna be the downfall of this nation 😢

You sent three videos of John Doyle, and not someone who studies the law.....

Because John Doyle understand the fundamental problem in our society than someone who "studies the law".

You infringe on peoples right with making everything about morality. That’s how you destroy freedom.

Your biggest flaw here is you are treating this merely as a legality issue, when it's *philosophical* in nature.

You destroy freedom by legalizing degeneracy. Plain and simple.

Your NAP can cope hard.

Ok, you like the second amendment right?

Or how about the first?

Also, John Doyle has a background on law school, as he said in previous videos, he was gonna be a lawyer before he decided to embark on his political career, so he knows plenty about law.

@MofoDoggo Gosh you are such a wall.

Being a lawyer and being pre-law are different.

Let me bring a hypothetical

Morally speaking it would be better to take guns away to save our children

What’s wrong with that

Dude, you are red herring hard on this. You have actually failed to address my issues and arguments and want to distract the conversation with "case laws" and "economics rules" when really, this is about how a nation can even survive as a unit.