Message from @Karnivore
Discord ID: 675543145131278373
Let's test your theory.
I have to go to my friends place for a dinner but i'll be back in a few hours I think it's a good topic
> ...current national median home price of $257,000...
a depressing one but a good one
understood
it certainly is interesting
bon apetit
I'm going to continue to type a few things here, so you can peruse it later
> According to the article, the median cost of a house in Atlanta now is $264,500.
compared to:
> ...current national median home price of $257,000
looks like you were right
I was too high by $7,500.
No.. you don't understand again
foolish
I said major cities
not national median of all cities
anyway ill be back later
Great, I will now search for filtered data that only includes major cities.
corrected to _now_
Here is the very first link:
Here is a quote from the article:
> "The median home price (half of all homes sold cost more, and half cost less) as of December 31 was $240,000"
Now I will look for more data.
ugh once again that's over 100 different cities not the top 10 major cities which were booming and were not giant ghettos in the 1920s
Great, so would you like to hand pick the cities now?
you could buy a nice house in a nice major city in the 1920's for the equivilant of $12,000 of todays money
I'm all for the comparison that you want to run.
my grandfather even built his own house and bought the land for a total of $6000 in the 1950s in a major city
but you keep changing the rules
I didn't change any rules
Please define your rules, so you don't have to stop and keep telling me that you're changing the rules again.
yes, you did
First it was 1920 vs 2020
When someone says "major cities" in the 1920s that doesn't mean 100 different cities including ones that are massive ghettos now
then it was major cities
then it was only the biggest cities
next only LA or NYC?
You expect me to read your mind now?
What? you are now trying to change the rules