Message from @Froski
Discord ID: 799272296640413707
"maybe" its hypocrisy (in regards to the hypocrisy of "no repsonsibility for content on our platforms" then, "parler is EVIL! PARLER IS RESPONSIBLE!"
I said that it was hypocrisy and the teacher was like "maybe"
no, it fucking is
god damn it politics are annoying
Yes I agree
I agree
“Parler lets hate speech on its platform! They’re responsible!”
It literally breaks the Section 230
not hate speech. open talk of insurrection and the kidnapping/killing of politicians, both of which are illegal
Hate speach isn't real
Ah, now that’s actually bad
if amazon wants to shut parler down for this, it's well within their right to do so
Hate speach is just another way of saying wrong think
^
wait how
if you say you hate gay people or black people have the warrior gene, do you think thats "wrong think"
or is it hate speech
Warrior gene?
blacks are more likely to commit crime because of some genetic difference
this tells me you don't actually know what hate speech is
Actually, it isn't based on the contract between the two companies. Plus, if they are going to do that, they should be doing it fairly for both Twitter and Parler.
Twitter allows for content that is completely horrendous, but because it fits their political viewpoint, they do not feel the need to censor it.
the content on twitter isn't breaking the law
no matter how horrendous you think it is, it isn't as bad as whats on parler
There is plenty of conduct on Twitter that breaks the law.
plus twitter actively enforces tos
which parler doesn't
parler allows for open talk of insurrection and political violence
Also, Hate Speech, per the Supreme Court, is not a law or banned speech.
it's not
this isn't hate speech
it's breaking the law
it should be enforced
EPIC
Also they have high single fatherhood rate
And poverty
i wonder why that is
But latinos who are poorer than blacks don't comit 26% of cimes
crimes
So poverty isn't the issue
Per the latino example
but it is