@PattonsWarrior dont say that all southerners were obviously moustache twirling villains

he is. trail of tears. defied the supreme court

Yup! I'm kinda a yank tard, up in CT but not fully. I'm based on most issues

Yank tards are cringe

whats a yanktard

so the trend is they think bloomberg is centrist/unbiased and you don't like that they think buzzfeed qualifies as news

A word i just made up

we can check allsides if you want?

Yankee retard it's truly genius

they werent, they were good people some of them most of the soldiers never saw a black person before, but they dont want you to think that, in fact in history it seems the north were more racsist then the average southerner

didn't bloomberg pay 10 million for the superbowl to plat his ad, over a pro 2A ad?

probably

Preaching to the choir buddy but u gonna get dogpiled

The issue is you seem to think only sources you provide are reliable because you use a biased source to affirm their credibility.

I am in the south. And my "racist" ass had a great time with my black nurse the other day. (Nothing off-color here. She just took some blood and such.)

dont compensate for a bad past just let it be known and dont repeat it

the sources i use are validated by basically every other bias checker

reuters and the ap

But those are biased, are they not?

everyone is bias

they aren't

How do i tell my ladyfriend I'm apparently racist to her <:ScreamingLiberal:720120350947541065>

Exactly.

The AP was one of the only news sources allowed in Nazi Germany pre ww2

This is why I disagree with removing statues and such.

“Fact check! Bias check!” People can’t you fact check for yourselves?

Deboonked

trail of tears- wasnt a democrat responsible for that... cough cough andrew jackson

basically, the AP was a literal Nazi Propaganda organization at one point

Get deboonked

reuters and the ap have consistently the most factual reporting out of any other news source

just find good info

idk

Yes, we can. The issue is brushing something off as a biased source because it doesn't align with what you believe.

Wait... you... are saying that for real?

Fk no! That sounds like work. 😄

yup

Why are you even talking to us if you think we're all stupid

if a source you bring up makes a claim but also has a history of manipulating the truth, then i won't believe what it says

yes... they weren't bad people they were great leaders and generals but because the winners write history they are made out to be evil

find another, unbiased source that says the same thing then i'll believe it