And besides, you don't think that if he wanted to he could radicalise violent mobs on the fly? You really think he needed some kind of code-language that may or may not be interpreted wrong for that to happen? Lol come on man, think !

There was over 30k people there, have you seen the videos?? Maybe just over a 100 people "stormed" the capital

If he REALLY did want to cause violence, he very well could've done so. There are some Trump loyalists who would kill for him (not saying I like that or not, just saying that's how it is). If he ordered them to get violent, many people would.

There were hundreds

He meant to have a peaceful rally.. exactly what happened. Like I said his rally was a 45 minute walk away from the capital building

Nancy Pelosi is committing treason with this speech. Lying to the American people. What a pathetic POS

People were upset and violently reacted, it’s no different than the summer riots

Without the speech, without his invitation to the mob to come to DC, and to march on the Capitol, without telling them that what was going on was the theft of an election even after he failed to make this case at the polls, and in the courts... do you think that mob would have engaged in sedition, terrorism, and likely treason?

And Swallwell setting there glaring at the republicans.

Nah bro, maybe 100-200... out of 30k people let's say 100-200 people "stormed" (aka peacefully walked into) the capital building that would come down to not even 1%

Lame whataboutism.

In context none of it incites violence

So just because he asked his supporters to peacefully protest at the Capitol means he's responsible for the violence that some people enacted? He's not some little devil sitting on their shoulders, telling them every move. The people who did what they did *made that decision for themselves.*

Jim Jordan about to go absolutely ham on these low IQ sheep

And you think that him requesting for a peaceful protest is an impeachable offense, but when Nancy Pelosi encourages that BLM rioters continue rioting, it's a "brave statement for justice"?

Give me a damn break.

This is 100 people

Can't make you count the bodies on screen from the coverage of the riot, but here's a point of reference if you're interested.

His mob? Peaceful protest lad. And yes I definitely think the UNARMED "mob" (of about 100-200 people, maybe not even that) would have marched on the capital, know why? Because they're sick a tired of the swamp and the corruption in general. Rather have them march on a government building than burn down innocents' houses, wouldn't you agree? You call them terrorists, yet they have not terrorised anyone, all they've done is intimidate a few government officials.

Mate I am fully aware how many people 100 is xD

Well said, man. Good job <:Ok:595777090868215858>

"hundreds and hundreds"

"violently stormed"

You can clearly see the "terror" in everyone's eyes

We've reached a boiling point where those willing to hold onto a position that places no responsibility on the president's shoulders for his own actions is not going to change.

Holy shit dude, that looks so violent

I can't even believe my eyes

“Caused mass damage” like 2 windows and most were picking up trash

Meanwhile, on CNN last Summer:

Ashli Babbit was murdered and I won’t accept any other answer

But, yes, do go on about how we're the problem.

And Antifa saying “she deserved it”

Suddenly Antifa loves cops now

@Yaboi I'm not interested in presenting evidence and litigating here.

Because you have none

Anyone willing to look into this is capable of doing so.

Not to mention that people who are much more capable of finding out what went on, and how to prosecute it, are already hard at work and will soon give us the details.

It’s all in what he said! You can’t read litigate what you thought he meant. Or the intent of the protestors