Message from @Enigmasflame

Discord ID: 588192344352882688


2019-06-12 02:21:57 UTC  

ye

2019-06-12 02:22:15 UTC  

There's already machines on auto assembly lines that *can* fix each other so it's not a matter of if but when

2019-06-12 02:22:19 UTC  

Sometimes you have hard power failures due to bad electrical wiring and it blows a breaker

2019-06-12 02:22:27 UTC  

What happens then

2019-06-12 02:22:39 UTC  

Again look at it this way, why would a company pay more for overhead than it has to?

2019-06-12 02:23:42 UTC  

Maybe the taxes paying for ubi become greater than the cost of hiring workers but that's a naive hope.

2019-06-12 02:23:45 UTC  

Meow

2019-06-12 02:23:46 UTC  

and ofc, the jobs needed in those fringe cases will be highly restricted/contested, making for an unhealthy job market

2019-06-12 02:24:04 UTC  

`Maybe the taxes paying for ubi become greater than the cost of hiring workers but that's a naive hope.`
You mean putting bailout money towards UBI instead of failing companies? sounds good

2019-06-12 02:24:11 UTC  

i mean, most sensors give a code when something goes, when that sensor is triggered then you can easily automate a fix for a certain thing, also the "who's going to fix the robots" is a faulty question at best

2019-06-12 02:24:41 UTC  

because the amount of jobs will still be way less then the specialized people to fix said issues that can't be fixed

2019-06-12 02:24:58 UTC  

I don't like socialism and UBI has its flaws, but industry bailouts is just confirmation of a monopoly

2019-06-12 02:25:20 UTC  

it's a sham

2019-06-12 02:25:34 UTC  

fucked if we do, fucked if we don't

2019-06-12 02:25:39 UTC  

<:clownpepe:564530802667290625>

2019-06-12 02:25:41 UTC  

certain companies not allowed to fail for *'reasons'* but others are

2019-06-12 02:25:51 UTC  

so much for a free market amirite?

2019-06-12 02:25:56 UTC  

atleast in the us yes

2019-06-12 02:26:07 UTC  

Yeah, from what I've seen it's asking for trouble. Companies aren't going to pay for it without a lot of demands and strings attached.

2019-06-12 02:26:10 UTC  

who cares if you're bad at doing business when taxpayers will fund you regardless?

2019-06-12 02:26:22 UTC  

there's no incentive to do better

2019-06-12 02:27:06 UTC  

Now hopefully Amazon can shake things up with ISPs

2019-06-12 02:27:11 UTC  

lmao

2019-06-12 02:27:27 UTC  

i didn't know that was even a thing

2019-06-12 02:27:28 UTC  

🤷

2019-06-12 02:27:30 UTC  

ye

2019-06-12 02:27:56 UTC  

What's amazon doing with isp's?

2019-06-12 02:28:05 UTC  

If there's anybody in any sort of remote position to compete with ISPs Amazon wouldn't be the worst choice cus you know Apple would fuck up before they started

2019-06-12 02:28:10 UTC  

Amazon is going to be an ISP

2019-06-12 02:28:17 UTC  

bunch of satellites being launched

2019-06-12 02:28:40 UTC  

Interesting.

2019-06-12 02:29:20 UTC  

i don't know, i could see that becoming a issue in its own way

2019-06-12 02:29:52 UTC  

Sure, if it isn't a good service at a competitive price then it could just be another false choice

2019-06-12 02:30:04 UTC  

I'm not saying you're wrong, but what do you mean? @Mr.Black

2019-06-12 02:30:32 UTC  

tbh though if you're stuck in areas where it's dogshit like Centurylink 🙄
Amazon will sound like a nice alternative

2019-06-12 02:30:36 UTC  

ye

2019-06-12 02:30:58 UTC  

so? it doesn't mean its not cancer <@241391082238246912> also don't use the "WhAt U NiGgAS KnoW IvE BeeN On IT" thats a strawman

2019-06-12 02:30:59 UTC  

fuck if I know

2019-06-12 02:31:27 UTC  

oh ye and ofc Elon's SpaceX rolling out their own ISP
🙄

2019-06-12 02:31:38 UTC  

Amazon's Project Kuiper

2019-06-12 02:31:41 UTC  

that's the one