if a faith is defensible, it must mean that there is certain validity to it. it also comes down to how a person defends it. I consider Christianity to be valid and defensible, you do not.
lmao
you don't understand logic
enlighten and illuminate me
a person can defend the spaghetti monster
doesn't mean the spaghetti monster exists
correct
then you're being inconsistent
how?
people often defend false or wrong arguments
why else do criminals get attorneys to defend their case in a court of law?
their position is illogical, but they are still defensible, technically speaking
https://tenor.com/view/buzz-lightyear-no-sign-of-intelligent-life-dumb-toy-story-gif-11489315
"certain validity", not absolute validity
theres certain moral stances that i agree with in islam with which I agree, but not the entire faith
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/748942847935512687/784303755205541908/ben_shapiro.png
zionism 101
https://parler.com/post/c41b0c5e1f0546d6bd63c55604e4528e
susquehanna, manayunk, schuylkill, punxsutawney
https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-group-of-bears-called-Why-is-it-called-that?share=1
https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1334637505262575618
"vast majority"
https://twitter.com/mchooyah/status/1334671839860240385
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America
https://youtu.be/Zt7r_XFMT_M
@Hippios
https://twitter.com/ToysRUs/status/1334889708615294979
@zekethefreak38 check my name 😉
