Message from @nate112332
Discord ID: 599728339070091264
he asked his buddy to stand guard
while he fucked the teacher
lmao
the context of both parties being interested is unclear
they did it numeruos times
how is it not
I'm not talking about this individual case
Would you extend the same olive branch if the gender were reversed?
If it was consensual, yeah.
depends on the context
probably
if it was the same exact situation
After all, it was the parents that outed this situation.
its still illegal to have sex with a minor tho
yes, that's not the argument
Well, as Birdman would say...
finish your memeing already
Well, it depends on her looks whether it's a crime or not
I'm kind of surprised this chick was put to the torch
We're talking about the THOT who raped a 15 y/o boy right? the one who claimed she wasn't "a threat to society"?
not even rape lol
the kid was down for it
<:donate:532089849814056971>
He's underage and couldn't consent by law. So technically rape.
<:no:480186122756947998>
I'm kind of wondering if there's any point avoiding the registry with a suppressor purchase
The boy was 13 yr old
I mean there's 1.5 million suppressor registries so I highly doubt they're going to target me for it
That's even worse @Xychotic
Yeah, according to the law.
That's definitely rape
Fuck that shit
Yup
But ronin's point was that the actions of everyone involved demonstrate that everyone knew exactly what was going on.
<:papafranku:532077431696392202>
Clearer evidence of "consent" could not be given.
The only reason this is rape is because of the hard age limit by law.
There's no such thing as consent within a certain age
So, ronin spits out the unrefined garbage claim of "not rape"
They cannot make an informed decision