If they can't certify, then who will determine Georgia?

do we have majority?

In GA yes

But we’d have to whip them to do it

Let's just count all the votes excluding Fulton County then Trump wins the state.

We are not even asking. We are *demanding* they do their job.

did anyone see tim pools vid today on PA <:MonkaS:370659947718901764>

Kemp is one of the Lords of RINOs, he rejected Trump's Emergency Recount Strengthen Order.

*Video Unavailable*

worked on my end

i even got to dl it

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1333571403384320000

Remember that certification is needed in order to sue

yep

Also judge wise

Remember a victory in the lower courts means nothing

well if it gets approved by the judge, then no bumping to sc

Yes

but gets denied by judge, then bumping to sc

depends on the victory ...if it's proven to the judge and accepts that dominion voting machines are a corrupt system for voting, then it sets precedent for all other courts in the nation to go against states using them in present and past elections

which any one of them could be sent up to the national sc

https://twitter.com/senmastriano/status/1333578227890221056?s=21

constitutional support from current gov leaders puts the corrupt in a bad position they can't win in

Fair point

trump didn't appoint federal judges...he appointed federal appeals court judges and sc justices first

the federal judges were left in place to expose their bias

see flynn case for example

a judge's bias against common/constitutional law saying the innocent must go free..proves they are bias against the constitution and the truth and there only for an agenda

under a bias judge, guilty until proven innocent

under a fair judge, innocent til proven guilty

But a SC victory would be big and it would have more omf

sc victory means last chance til sc changes again and a point in time for said cases comes back around again

several cases did the repeat trips to the sc in the past..each time after a change in the sc population

hell even roe vs wade went a few rounds in sc over the past few decades

cases when they go to sc and get passed by sc does not make them the law of the land, it just means they're not constitutional violations of the existing laws and rights of the constitution

roe vs wade only applies to 1 state and 1 state only

the state where the case took place in

it's the corrupt that abused the position of it passing in the national sc that gave the impression to the less informed that it was a new abortion law and ended up getting abused by pp

and the primary premise of roe vs wade was for abortion for rape cases only...not for every time ur condom broke

Trump winning Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Georgia will be the same as the 2016 results