Message from @Dank_Furry_Pirate

Discord ID: 787809430971613225


2020-12-13 22:27:15 UTC  

And they looses in circuit court in WI

2020-12-13 22:27:30 UTC  

They can just appeal it, they are prohibed to do another one of the style

2020-12-13 22:28:50 UTC  

Weird how we own a little sliver of cuba

2020-12-13 22:29:00 UTC  

I wonder what’s the history behind that

2020-12-13 22:29:01 UTC  

well constitutional election laws have to be interpreted properly for each case, texas lawsuit was broadband against 4 separate cases...not defining to each case except for the fraud ....it has to be more fine tuned to each case involved for sc to even look at it

2020-12-13 22:30:03 UTC  

TX was not dismissed on merit but lack of standing
So they didnt look the proof

2020-12-13 22:30:09 UTC  

Since the problem with the Texas case is that Texas doesn’t have ground to argue it

2020-12-13 22:30:21 UTC  

It has to be an offended party

2020-12-13 22:30:28 UTC  

Like trump or the legislature

2020-12-13 22:31:01 UTC  

It’s a future vacation spot for a lot of people. Permanent vacation. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

2020-12-13 22:31:08 UTC  

discrediting the value of other states isn't enough of a standing for the sc

2020-12-13 22:31:25 UTC  

Yeah I know it’s bs

2020-12-13 22:31:42 UTC  

Oh

2020-12-13 22:32:01 UTC  

It should definitely be fixed after this though

2020-12-13 22:32:06 UTC  

the problem is texas needs a more seasoned constitutional legal team to argue this

2020-12-13 22:32:34 UTC  

Yes

2020-12-13 22:32:45 UTC  

The TX case is good. They just need to re word it. It’s solid.

2020-12-13 22:33:01 UTC  

Texas probably would have gotten it if they had a constitutional scholar look over it

2020-12-13 22:33:06 UTC  

one of the sc appointees was from texas..that didn't get selected to be sworn in

2020-12-13 22:33:12 UTC  

But besides that the argument is gold

2020-12-13 22:33:25 UTC  

and she's not even on the texas legal team

2020-12-13 22:33:52 UTC  

Yeah arguments are solid
If cruz argument another case similar its good

2020-12-13 22:34:00 UTC  

But Trump teams need to do it

2020-12-13 22:34:03 UTC  

Not Texasè

2020-12-13 22:34:21 UTC  

Focus on constitutional issue
Fraud a bit with irregularities
But Constitution first

2020-12-13 22:47:11 UTC  

looks that way...

2020-12-13 22:47:56 UTC  

Everyone has been talking about E.O 2018 13848

2020-12-13 22:47:56 UTC  

hope its ture

2020-12-13 22:48:02 UTC  

It is true

2020-12-13 22:48:05 UTC  

The E.O exists

2020-12-13 22:48:25 UTC  

Lol “could”. He wrote that shit in 2018 when he laid this trap. He’s definitely using it. Martial law is coming.

2020-12-13 22:49:02 UTC  

It’s an Extreme Violation of National Security

2020-12-13 22:49:10 UTC  

Read and learn.

2020-12-13 22:49:14 UTC  

I don't care if Martial Law enacts I'm like a house cat, I want to stay inside safely.

2020-12-13 22:49:43 UTC  

every eo takes up to a yr to take effect depending on the preset time limit written into it

2020-12-13 22:49:47 UTC  

Just hope he have enough proof to trigger it
With CHINA SPY
It will help

2020-12-13 22:49:55 UTC  

If this enacts, it's like a Half-Life 2 RP Judgement Waiver.

2020-12-13 22:50:21 UTC  

also the preset time limits written into eo's can also have time limits for eo to be in effect

2020-12-13 22:50:39 UTC  

Like a year

2020-12-13 22:50:44 UTC  

Or about