Message from @ToxicTransgender
Discord ID: 796089953272070144
Their goal is to defeat the commies and they’ll say whatever they want for people to distrust them
Has any other news outlet declared the news that XI ordered to prepare for war?
Or was that just them
Isn’t that... what’s that called... fact checking?
No wrong word
China Uncensored has been reporting on Chinese forces aggression for quite some time. But I don't know if they have done anything recent. Kind of stepped away from the news due to holidays.
Oh I’m happy you brought him up
Give me 2 min I’ll brb
Also part of New Tang Dynasty Television
I can put this <#763630921403465728> if you want
But this is all fucking bought and payed for by Falun Gong
CGTN added, “It asked the armed forces to maintain a high level of readiness and step up emergency and combat training.” Xi Jinping wants “full-time combat readiness”. He also wants the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to “act at any second”.
As per the Chinese state media, “Stressing strengthening the rule of law over military training, the order said training management should be reformed and the evaluation system should be improved.”
Xi, who literally commands Chinese armed forces, has also ordered the PLA to “substantially increase” the use of technology in its exercises. He also said, “[The PLA must] increase the integration of new equipment, new forces and new combat realms into training and combat systems.”
..........
But within China, Xi anticipates a major chaos. Following the Pandemic, economic slowdown and global backlash against China, Xi is facing strong anti-incumbency. Also, Xi administration is losing the faith of investors- both domestic and foreign, which is why the Chinese President actually targeted Jack Ma.
What are you trying to say by that?
you figure it out
Cuz the article by TFI says he’s embracing being monitored
And this says he’s not being monitored he’s just lying low
Or just a few clearly biased sources
You tell me
So what exactly is the crux of the issue with epoch times? Do you fault them for association, the articles, is it both? If so, then post a conflicting source that meets the standards of both.
I think that would resolve the confusion on everyone's part.
Look at this interesting bit
This was released in Oct 2020
The same info is only now released on media you trust
Could it be that it is used for another purpose
Like for example, fearmongering and further distrust of the CCP
(For clarification here, I’m not defending the CCP, I just don’t want my info to come from illegitimate sources backed by cults and maniacs)
Jack Ma, the multibillionaire founder of tech companies Alibaba and Ant Group, went missing after criticizing China's financial system by calling for changes and reforms.
>>>>>
Apparently Ma would not agree with your evaluation of things... fotrunately he is safe for now
Where is this from?
So the problem I have is, by your rubric, would posting CNN be considered a good source? Like if we applied the scrutiny of association and not the quality of the article, does your post count?
You asked me to find a source
CNN, to me, is as reliable as The Epoch Times
The article in itself doesn’t matter in this scenario but it shows that the information was out there way before
I asked to find a source that fits the rubric you want for the epoch times.
Cause if we are using associations and not the work as a rubric, then what exactly are we left with. I don't mind CNN when they get it right. Same should go for all publications.