Message from @Mentrex
Discord ID: 775044695910121492
in a 9-0 decision they ruled speech on the internet was entitled to the highest levels of first amendment protections similar to what is granted to books and news papers
not even sworn in and is going to get into fights with the supreme court
yeah the right needs a civil liberties group
R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 112 S.Ct. 2538, 120 L.Ed.2d. 305 (1992): St. Paul, Minnesota passed an ordinance that banned "hate speech," any expression, such as a burning cross or swastika, that might arouse anger, alarm, or resentment in others on the basis of race, color, religion, or gender. The Supreme Court struck the ordinance down as unconstitutionally discriminating based on the content of expression: the law banned only fighting words that insult based on race, religion, or gender, while abusive invective aimed at someone on the basis of political affiliation or sexual orientation would be permissible. The law thus reflected only the city's special hostility towards certain biases and not others, which is what the First Amendment forbids.
could use this as well
its not hate speech if its against white people or spoken from a "POC"
cause only white people can be racist hurr durr
supreme court doesn't do that, least it shouldn't
depends on how deep the leftist bs has gotten
in all I could see it as them attempting this shit and getting slapped by the supreme court
at 6 to 3 yeah
or 5 to 4 what ever it is
we've gotten less activists judges now
Thank god
but they are still there
i can see this and im in new zealand
if going off of straight precedence these actions are unconstitutional.
the equity bs they want is racist
only way Biden and them are getting it all done is by repealing the laws on discrimination
God forbid reparations becomes a thing
iv i were to do the same but for a white person id be up on racial prejudice
basically it would take all of congress, the president, and the supreme court to agree that USC 31 should be repealed or altered
rewriting the 1964 civil rights act and the civil rights act of 1968
didnt cali or some shit try to repeal civil rights laws
states can do what they want so long as they can vote on majorities
federally shit is a lot more complicated
and the supreme courts can still rule on things like that IF they think something's fucky
I feel that if Biden tries his BS it's gonna be a lot of the supreme court going "Hol up."
it will start at the senate
Fs in the chat
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F